The Forum > Article Comments > No god doesn’t mean life is dull, monotonous or pointless > Comments
No god doesn’t mean life is dull, monotonous or pointless : Comments
By Jake Farr-Wharton, published 4/11/2011A naturalistic interpretation of the universe is both valid and far from depressing.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
-
- All
Posted by Bugsy, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 5:28:47 PM
| |
the god insists
thus that he egsists topic http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11008&page=0 i feel that god is in our goodness or rather the oneness of our enjoined goodness we hear of atonment...note at-one-meant.. think of this we are flesh.. animated as much chemicly as electonicly so our muscles move by an electric impluse.. our brain has electric sig-nature this elect-trick-al emination gives us the image we see in a kirilan photograph..but essentialy is energy science law says energy cant be created nor destroyed so one second your 'living'..the next your 'dead' but think where did..all that mind/muscle 'energy'..go to [to the collective at one=meant..we call god..[the collective sum total of all that ever was ..all that ever can be..and all that ever will be the collective inteligence.. collective life..collective logic that calls itself simply 'i am' we live in a finite expanding uni=verse in time it expands into so finer divisions.. it disipitates out..into the aether..[again].. till in time bits start attracting togeter and instead of expanding..the mass starts collapsing in on itself with such impetus..that it condenses in its final[pre big bang..size] when once again a small change of state [and the earth was yet again..'without form' and yes the darkness was on the face of the deep and yes the collective good..[god] mooves..yet again..on the face of the waters and the innocent [of all living loving grace and mercy gets his/her own re birth moment..[emerging from the waters] dares to say,.. wtf..'let there be light' and with a big bang*.. behold it shon for miles and the collective at=one-meant..saw that yet again its all goog..[all god] i insist..! thus i egsist Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 7:06:01 AM
| |
"How can you have love and devotion for something which doesn't exist?"
I enjoyed Crabsy's answers while I was timed out. Now let me put it in my own words: A better question is "How, and why would you, love and be devoted to something which does exist?" There is nothing but God - existence is an illusion, so if you ever loved or adored anything or anyone (including yourself), then you loved and adored God, only you probably did so in an unconscious and indirect way. Posted by Yuyutsu, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 8:08:40 AM
| |
So, now we have the claim that our very existence is an illusion.
>>There is nothing but God - existence is an illusion...<< There must come a point, surely, when it starts to dawn on these folk that the very fact that they need to pervert the English language in order to describe God, indicates the utter shallowness of their ideas. It reminds me of those 1960s hippies, who had collectively discovered that dope turns them into semi-geniuses, as they all sat around telling each other "wow, man, that's so... true!" How empty can your thinking get, guys? "There is nothing but God" I wonder how Ivan Milat fits the "nothing but" concept. Or Anders Behring Breivik. "Existence is an illusion". That's interesting. So Jesus' existence was an illusion? I suspect there are a few devout Christians who might disagree with that idea, Yuyutsu. I'm sure Peter Sellick is right there with you, though, it's right up his street. But honestly, what utter tosh. Posted by Pericles, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 3:57:31 PM
| |
Do I cease to exist when God realises he is a metaphysical solipsist?
Posted by WmTrevor, Thursday, 10 November 2011 3:15:48 AM
| |
per ridicules is so good at picking out a brief line
then using it out of context..to garner his harvest if only things were as simple as he thinks but he is SUSTAINED TO LIVE..by the same life sustaining good he is living this same dream of sepperatness even here ammoung others of like ilk..as himself..and my self look at yourself..ol mate that you you call you..mate that is more than you [its over a trillion other life forms..living in and on you without them doing 'their thuing' you couldnt 'do' your thing if the yeasts didnt do as yeast do if the acids didnt do what they do if your body didnt have the bugs in/on it no life can live [of itself]..not even yours there is a bigger picture...you [and i]..arnt 'just' you and i..its a host of other living things collectivly..[in total]..all life has the same life sustainer all living the gift of their life..given faclitated..sustained..by god if you got proof of no god or that you can make you live..[by your will alone].. please present it your clever enough to know you cant you got opinion..thats all just like we got as the koran says first make just one like it [ie first make yoyur own life]..before decrying the good god of life/nature/nurture..doing it all such is his nature serving the best equally the least their life gift the one good living loving god doing it all..for all of us till you prove different.. got any proof ol mate or just opinion? Posted by one under god, Thursday, 10 November 2011 7:17:39 AM
|
Ain't that the truth.