You are still clutching at straws, I notice Arjay.

>>The Herald Sun also on this day conducted a survey and 77% of 10,000 respondents agreed with Kevin Bracken.<<

Not true.

The question was not about the facts, or even about the theories.

The question was "Do you think Kevin Bracken's comments were reasonable?"

"Agree" does not appear anywhere. Nor can it be inferred.

I find the comments of many people here on OLO "reasonable", but it doesn't mean that I agree with a single word of them.

And where on earth did you find this nonsense?

>>In Germany it is higher @ 85% as with the people of New York.<<

What question were they asked, Arjay?

C'mon, let's see some facts, none of this fake "I agree" rubbish.

Dear Arjay and Pericles,

The number of people who believe something is true is not evidence of truth.

John Adams,the second president of the United States, said, "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

At one time many people believed that a pantheon of gods existed. Now monotheism is more fashionable. There is no evidence for either.

David f just look at the scientific forensic evidence here http://www.ae911truth.org/ There are also hundreds of other here; http://patriotsquestion911.com/ who were leaders of contries,high ranking military/Govt officials ex-cia, 400 hundred professors,scientists,200+ in the entertainment industry,400+ Medical Drs and 1400+ Architects and engineers.

Should we not have a proper enquiry?

Arjay,

Look at the names of the sites you provided ... doesn't that give you pause for thought?

Read physicists' explanation of 9/11 ... and who address the conspiracy theories.

Manuel Garcia, Jr: The Physics of 9/11
http://www.counterpunch.org/physic11282006.html

Nutty 9-11 Physics
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/pseudosc/911nutphysics.htm

"Apparently, the melting of steel signifies the use of explosives or thermite cutting charges. But the purpose of either is to cut steel, not melt it. A controlled demolition simply does not produce large amounts of molten steel. You might as well argue that all the concrete dust shows the buildings were taken down by an army of gnomes armed with grinding wheels."

Implosion World, a site dedicated to controlled building collapse,
http://www.implosionworld.com/wtc.htm

Good Try Danielle but it didn't work .I have met Prof Steven Jones a Physicist,Prof Niels Harrit and Dr Frank Legg( the Australian scientist).It was Neils Harritt who led the team of 9 international scientists that proved scientificly that nano thermite,a highly sophistocated explosive was found in the dust of all 3 buildings at WTC.Building 7 which no plane impacted came down at freefall speeds in a controlled demolition style 7 hrs later.Nano thermite cannot be made in a backyard lab.Only advanced Military sources had that technology.

It is interesting to note that the US also is using nano technology to make mini-nukes that can fit on the end of a cannon shell.

Your attempts to discredit all these people will do your cause no good.So why not have an international investigation with all the evidence presented?

The wars by the USA are expanding and with a new candidate like Donald Trump saying they should just take the Libyan oil and give them a bit for development,the alarm bells should be ringing.They want to attack Iran but have yet to find a good excuse.China and Russia have a defence pact with Iran.With Fukushima out of control,the last thing we need is a mini-nuke war instigated by the USA Global Corporates.

It is in all our interests to reveal the truth and stop the wars of imperialism.

Arjay,

OLO contributors can do a "search" for Prof Steven Jones, Prof Niels Harrit and Dr Frank Leg and determine their relative credentials and academic rigour for themselves.

The more I find out, the more I dismiss them as credible. But others can make their own assessments.

Of interest ... Prof Niels Harrit shared a stage with Holocaust denier Kevin Barrett in London on 7/7/2009, the 4th anniversary of the tube bombings, but rather than discuss this, Harrit focussed on 9/11. Methinks somewhat prejudiced ...