The Forum > Article Comments > Family Law Act: too little, too late > Comments
Family Law Act: too little, too late : Comments
By Patricia Merkin, published 7/12/2010It is likely that child protective amendments to the Family Law Act will be significantly watered down for political motives.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Page 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- ...
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
- All
Oh I agree, which is why I find it so interesting when you find yourself knee-jerking to a comment like James's or mine. Why do you find discussions of the biological differences between genders so confronting to you personally?
Pelican:"Comments like "hormone soaked" drip too easily from your keyboard"
Actually, "hormone-soaked nightmare" was my ex's self-description. She was very aware of the problem but it was beyond her ability to do much about it.
And please, don't try the "we are all individuals" stuff. Men have testicles and penises, women have ovaries and vaginas. These are not trivial differences and trying to pretend otherwise is not being "even-handed", it's denying reality.
Yes, there is a vast range of expressions of "femaleness" and "maleness", but males are not prone to a monthly cycle and "male menopause" is a simply a slow reduction in the level of testosterone, not a relatively sudden change that means he can no longer reproduce and is no longer subject to those monthly cycles.
The idea that the biological differences between the genders are not important is simply bizarre and flies in the face of reality.
On the subject of PMS, I'll bet that everyone here has a horror story to recount. No exceptions, male or female. That makes it a pervasive issue, not an individual aberration.
In some women, it is almost like living with a short-cycle bipolar sufferer - one never knows exaclty when the swing will come, but you know it's coming.