Wow! Proxy, you are one sick dude. Seek professional help.

Don't waste your life in this wasteland of hateful ignorance. I wonder if someone has damaged you or this is just your twisted nature. A cure is possible but I doubt it.

Sorry you have to live like this. It must be absolutely awful.

My condolences.

David

As a self-professed atheist, what possible objection could you possibly have to loving, incestuous couples seeking happiness together and enjoying the same societal recognition that you would confer on others?
Why do you deny them their basic human rights?
Why do you discriminate against certain members of society on the basis of their sexuality?
I find your stance hypocritical, to say the least.

No Proxy, it's because I am not an idiot!

David

"If homosexuals are allowed to marry then its only fair that incestuous couples, polyamorous groups and bestial couples or groups are allowed to marry."
-Proxy

If you insist, dear. But it's worth noting that the only person on this whole forum who has consistently pushed for equality for polygamy, bestiality and incest is Proxy himself. Is there something you're not telling us?

"They should enjoy the same "fundamental human rights" as homosexuals."
-Proxy

Only by your sick and perverse reasoning. We don't all like to bang our cousins, mate - why don't you just keep it in the family?

"You cannot logically differentiate yourselves from the practitioners of other deviant forms of sexual behaviour."
-Proxy

Yes, I can. And your misuse of plurals is misplaced.

"By the reasonable measure of fecundity, homosexual behaviour is more deviant than at least two of the three other behaviours I have mentioned."
-Proxy

Apparently I missed the memo about fecundity and homosexuality. Care to refresh me?

David the Atheist.

Sorry mate.. you have zero credibility because you cannot address the clearly morally superior arguments of Proxy.

You are simply calling him names.. the obvious sign of 'no' argument.

The case is closed and the argument won by those who care about the texture, shape and morality of our society. I.e...those WITH an argument, such as Proxy and myself and I'm sure, others.

David..here is how it works.

POSITION=> IMPLICATIONS
E.G.

Position: "White People are all evil"
Implication "There is a whitey...he must be evil"

If you don't have the reasoning powers to dispute with rational logic..why bother at all?

You just make yourself a laughing stock I'm afraid.

I won't be signing up for the AFA :) and I hope those who DO have a much higher level of polemical standing than what's being demonstrated here by your good self.

I'm not trying to 'flame' you.. I'm simply responding to the 'name calling' you espouse which IS flaming!

RIZ...you are as guilty as David for flaming.

"Only by your sick and perverse reasoning."

Nope..not by sick OR perverse reasoning....but by reasoning which any philosophy 101 student would agree is 'completely appropriate'.

It seems those in the opposing camp are infected with the 'liberal gene' which prevents them (you) from actually being able to follow the normal sequence of 'position/implication' as any rational person would do.

You are also resorting to name calling! and thus, we can consign your meagre (empty/vacuous) attempts to argue a case to the rubbish bin named "poor debate, if it can even be called that"

You and David both need help... to enable you to recognize that with those liberal genes, you are incapable (without significant mental detoxification and therapy) of seeing a rational logical sequence of argument.

The genes only 'push' you in a direction.. 'predispose' so to speak...but you have a will..and in time you will be able to recognize when your genes are speaking against rationality and make appropriate decisions by force of will.