The Forum > Article Comments > Just how green are The Greens? > Comments
Just how green are The Greens? : Comments
By Mark Poynter, published 13/10/2010The Greens’ forests agenda is set to undermine effective climate action.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Posted by Donno, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 12:47:07 PM
| |
The Greens are not green at all.
They are green on the outside as the Fabian wolf is clothed in a sheepskin. http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/FabianWindow-1.jpg The Greens are Fabian Socialists..by deed if not by membership. Gillard is one Plibersek is one Whitlam founded them in Australia Hawke and Keating were members Bob Brown ? don't know but if deeds are an indicator.... http://www.openaustralia.org/senator/bob_brown/tasmania Brown wants GLOBAL GOVERNMENT.... hmmm rather like "International Socialism" does..... strange eh. Anyone who works toward the undermining of Australian indepenance and sovereignty is a traitor and should be treated as such. It's called 'SEDITION'. Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 2:21:57 PM
| |
Climate change is a real and dangerous threat to our planet. The Greens (and the Australian media at large) akin sustainable native forestry to the deforestation occurring in developing countries that result in such enormous amounts of carbon released into the atmosphere, despite forestry being the antithesis of land clearing and deforestation. We live in a global community and a have an obligation as a developed country to continue to created renewable, carbon positive products for consumers, whilst managing our forests to continue to grow inperpetua.
The misrepresentation of sustainable native forestry by the Greens and the media does a disservice to curbing climate change and is not aligned with the broader international community. Posted by Guardia forestale, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 2:25:12 PM
| |
Guardia
Tyranny does not care about the 'broader international opinion'..... Posted by ALGOREisRICH, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 2:31:36 PM
| |
Many people talk of the Red/greens as being watermelons, green on the outside & "pinko" commie on the inside. I prefer to think of them as Unripe Guavas, green on the outside & dark red, bitter & twisted on the inside.
I saw its formation & they were all well known CARS, Communist, Anarchist, Radical, Socialists. I have been on debate forums with them online & in person. They always had no ideas about what positive could be done, only about what to stop, all progress & jobs. Posted by Formersnag, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 2:50:09 PM
| |
Whether it be water or forests, the stony ideologues in the Greens care nothing for the living, breathing people who are merely inconvenient, bothersome stumbling blocks on the road to a Green utopia.
Posted by Clownfish, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 8:57:16 PM
|
I like your reference to woodchipping but it could be improved on.
The public need to understand that "evil woodchips" are produced as a legitimate harvesting product. Let me elaborate.
The very best of native forest and plantation runs at about 1 of sawlog to 1 of below sawlog quality - normally woodchips. Assuming a 50% recovery of sawlog, woodchip now constitutes approximately 75% of the tree and is used for a range of common and accepted products - sawn timber, paper, MDF etc. A simple message needs to be conveyed to the public. I wonder if there is a journo or two out there with the brains to wake up to the Greens ajenda and depict them for what they really are - a bunch of troglodytes.
Good stuff Mark. Keep it up.
Don Thomson