Since you all refuse to even look at the forensic scientific evidence of http://ae911truth.org/ or the hundreds of people on http://patriotsquestion911.com/ then you would all agree to an international investigation?

President Ahmadinejad of Iran at his recent UN addess said there was hard evidence of US Govt involvement in 911. 27 countries walked out, but 167 stayed and gave him a warm response.An international lawyer Franklin Lamb says there is more than enough evidence for international court to be established.

So if logic were to prevail,you would all agree to an international investigation that looks at all the hard scientific and circumstancial evidence of 911?

You see, Arjay. This is what happens.

>>President Ahmadinejad of Iran at his recent UN addess said there was hard evidence of US Govt involvement in 911.<<

That bunch of deluded, self-promoting, unfulfilled nerds who have been cultivating the "it's a CIA/Mossad/whatever conspiracy" theory over the years, have provided a clever, opportunistic enemy of Israel and the US with a perfect stick with which to beat them.

He doesn't have to prove anything, or provide even the tiniest shred of evidence. All he has to do is point to the fervid cesspool of self-indulgent know-nothings, who are doing all his destabilization work for him.

If you manage to achieve your objective, which is clearly to help as much as you can to provide Iran with the international political justification to blow Israel to smithereens, I sincerely hope that someone makes it their mission to find you, and "take you in for questioning" over your personal contribution.

Arjay, I looked at your evidence and asked you some questions about it. Frankly, much of it simply doesn't stack up. I'm still waiting for your reply. Rather than crying "nobody listens to me", how about answering some questions?

Thank you, Pericles, yours is always a refreshing and provocative voice, on any OLO thread.

Joe

OK Otokomoko.Yes the planes did exist but they were just the distraction from the nano thermite which brought down the towers.Don't forget that WTC 7 was not impacted by a plane.Prof Niels Harrit says there may have been other explosives too.There is clear visual use of cutter charges on the outer crucial structure.

Just see Prof David Chandler youtube 911 south tower.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnR4A4zb8B0&feature=related Now NIST ( National Institute for Standards and Technology)says that the planes compromised the mid structure thus the top of the towers acted as pile drivers causing a pane cake collapse of the towers.Looking at the video,the top of the South tower tilts a 23 deg and almost reaches horizontal before it vapourises into concrete dust.

The NIST pile driver should have continued on that vector and fallen over.Instead it self destructed before proceeding on that course.A hammer cannot drive a nail home with an angle of 23 deg since the nail will bend.This hammer vapourised before reaching it's nail at the wrong angle.

The main object of this video by Chandler was to prove the existance of explosives,however there is further revealing evidence that puts NIST's theory to the sword.In addition, there is no way that the towers could have come down in 11 sec at almost freefall speeds since this means that the lower structures provided absolutely no resistance to gravity.

So on three counts NIST's theory has absolutely no credibility.

But then we must discount the testimonies of many of the pilots cited on Patriots Question 911, whose central argument is that it would have been impossible for experienced pilots, let alone novices, to hit the towers with such precision.