Don't take him seriously, Foxy.

You're a much respected contributor to OLO. He's just a troll.

I only just noticed how he'd not only parodied your alias, but also emulated your posting style, with the shortened lines. Quite creepy, really, when you think about it.

Not to mention that he's obviously stalking you around the threads.

I just hope you don't own a virtual rabbit :D

Thanks Pynchme, and thanks also for putting some good humour back into this discussion.

I reckon no-one makes the "letter to Laura" case better than Jed Bartlett: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD52OlkKfNs

Hiya woulfe!

Thanks - the movie version is beaut.

I have to say that I rather like the way the email though
is signed off as if it's a humble fan; it was just a nice
contrast.

I'm starting to wonder if some of the folk here actually
get the joke.

Keep your lovely sense of humour,

pynch :)

Woulfe

Where would we be without Leviticus?

Loved your article, enjoy reading your posts both for their sanity and humour.

Hey Pynchme and David f; I think it's a little unfair to bring the ancient Greeks into the argument.
After all, it's common knowledge the female orgasm wasn't invented until after Queen Victoria died.
I'm with Stevenlmeyer. I just dropped in to find out how such a simple and straightforward article could possibly stimulate 58 comments.

Woulfe,
It is clear that the homosexual agenda is driven by lies, denial, propaganda and political hardball.
The 10% of the population lie.
The homosexual gene lie.
The immutability lie.
The false analogy with race.
Denial of homosexual pathologies.
Distortion by data selection.
Ignoring contrary evidence.
The APA takes a purely political stance on this issue,
having been intimidated into abandoning a scientific stance long ago.