McReal,

You might like to consider that evolution is extremely poor science.

Dear Runner,
Please concider Mat 7-6 and 2 Tim 2-14 to 19 in that order.
Regards Richie 10

its a typical piece of redirective pap...talking to its followers

no science evidence of evolution is presented...in other words rebut a concept...
..while not proving..the THEORY..of evolution of species..is NOT/explaining..evolution of genus..

irreducable complex..is not subject to evolution..cant be..because it is of nill affect on its own...in the steps needed to be evolved..before...the complex/compounded parts..does its evolutionary fruit

take a case mentioned..in other opinion piece rebuttals...of a creature...that dies..to repoduce...where was its first one...that needed to live to die...to make the 'first'..

even a simple bacteria mentioned in other pieces...its tail...needs a moter...to move its tail..even before a tail..can evolve..[consisting of 10 sepperate parts..]...random change...hardly...no natural for NATURE..to select from

while we are at it....what is science about/nature..as in natural selection...thats not science..only gods/nature....the intel/designer doing it naturally

to say imperfection is evidence of no perfect..is insane..and science deception..preaching to the decieved..by science..as is usual...or rather the ignorant needing to believe their beliefs..in no god

its clever how you idiots jump on these things...lacking critical thinking abilities..you hang your opinion/belief..on selective pap

where is your evidence of no designer..

present your proof...or name the first life that evolved...

reveal the root..of your tree of evolution...it dont have one..why dont it have one...irreducable complexity...ie..nothing to evolve..even the ameaba...has many complex parts..as proved in yet other debaits...all of you lost

you claim science...well present it..just because you can have faith in science..dosnt exclude god

many years ago..the masses..thought the earth was flat...
and the unthinking..[you lot]..went along with the lie..then..because they had faith in the...'science'..opinion..

but you flat earthers..who know nothing but..faith in science...
you have your beliefs...and your high priests..thier holy text's..own marters/and own saints..

just like any other..faith system..only yours is con-cieved by science/godheads..pretending..they have the only..'true belief'..and sold by fluff and huff

present your science

Dear Runner,
Read Ps 14 then ask your self where are all the bones. Once I was one of the vast crowd then Mat 7-13,14 happened to me Richie 10. I met the man who said the above words and I chose to follow him and the longer you travel down thr road the understanding comes for he calles us out of the crowd to walk with him. What a privilege!

""consider that evolution is extremely poor science."
runner .. Saturday, 15 May 2010 10:32:33 PM

under one god

Austrian monk Gregor Mendel provided the first and most significant evidence and proof after Darwin - his work with over 20,000 pea plants makes him the father of genetics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_inheritance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mendelian_traits_in_humans

Subsequent development of molecular cell biology, palaeontology, etc has made evolution fact.

Moreover, Michael Zimmerman's article was not an essay on evolution that you claim it should be.

runner: << You might like to consider that evolution is extremely poor science. >>

How would you know, runner? As far as I can recall, in all of the idiotic twaddle you've posted at OLO over the years, you've never demonstrated any scientific understanding beyond that of a third grade primary school student.

Where's Dan the Meringue? At least his ID sophistry is mildly entertaining.