The Forum > Article Comments > Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists > Comments
Land of opportunity, but not for monoculturalists : Comments
By Rachel Woodlock, published 17/2/2010While young Muslim Australians can positively appreciate Australia as a land of opportunity, Ms Pauline Hanson cannot.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
- All
Posted by ozzie, Sunday, 7 March 2010 11:01:08 PM
| |
C.J.
Scientists need to study the time frames of those genetic differences, that may also play a huge role in determining racial acceptance or hostility also. The fellow that said he was descended from about five different countries does not seem to give any thought to the fact that all these countries are predominantly European and white. Say for a minute that he did have some evidence of African in him. That connection may be far outfactored when it comes to racial acceptance (in either the white races or the black races)because it was a thousand years ago whereas his European connection only dates back to more recent centuries. Posted by CHERFUL, Sunday, 7 March 2010 11:29:49 PM
| |
Lucy the UNSW Law graduate said,
"More importantly, none of the mainstream media has made this a race issue. There hasn't been any comment by the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald or the Australian that endorsed a view that this was a race issue. " Let's have a look at that "The Age" headline said "Man charged over death of INDIAN boy" see http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-national/man-charged-over-death-of-indian-boy-20100307-ppw6.html Lucy, if it's not a race issue why mention the that the boy is Indian. The murderer is just as indian as the boy but no mention of that in the headline. Why would that be Lucy? "The Sydney mornign Herald" headline "Australia launches probe into INDIAN toddler's death" see http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/australia-launches-probe-into-indian-toddlers-death-20100305-poli.html Lucy, again if it's not a race issue why mention the boy is Indian. What has that got to do with the story. Why not just say ".. probe into death of toddler". "The Australian" headline today, yes today Lucy "Time to stop Playing the RACE card" see http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/time-to-stop-playing-the-race-card/story-e6frg6ux-1225837937282 this article talks about the lull in reporting racist attacks in Australia until the death of this poor little boy, when it again increased. Lucy, again what planet do you live on? All of these papers you stated had "There hasn't been any comment by the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald or the Australian that endorsed a view that this was a race issue" have indeed made mention of a race issue. I have only mentioned 3 articles here to demonstrate that what you have said is totally false. There are countless other examples in the same papers, and other media. Lucy, I notice above in your comments when you can't back up your views with facts you attempt to discredit me by attacking my character, for instance "what kind of person does that" etc etc. Or you attempt to pull off the "I'm a big time lawyer, does that make you feel small or inadequate". You told me this in a previous thread. These are basically all signs that you have no factual basis for your views. So lets just stick to the facts. Posted by ozzie, Sunday, 7 March 2010 11:41:09 PM
| |
Examples of prime indicators of profiles of racist bigots;
[1] Gross exaggeration and obsessive distortion; As attributed to ozzie: “Now 4 out of the last 5 murders in Australia have been committed by Indians. Still this case was constantly presented in the media as being a racist Australian attack.” “So I have not made this into a race issue, people like YOU have. And now it is beginning to backfire on you, as Australian’s are finding out the truth. That’s why he’s there Lucy, because people like you lie.” “So I have not made this a race issue, people like YOU have. And now it is beginning to backfire on you, as Australian’s are finding out the truth. These crimes are indeed committed by Indians themselves.” [2] Gross exaggeration and obsessive distortion, with attempted manipulation; As attributed to ozzie: “Face the facts Lucy. You can’t or just refuse to see what is right in front of your eyes.” ….”The MC’lists such as yourself are continually bombarding the rest of Australia with the great advantages of MCism. I am pointing out some of the obvious disadvantages. Seems only fair in a balanced debate to hear from both sides.” The contributions of CHERFUL are so observedly ‘whacko’ I’ll just acknowledge that to save space. Really, these posts are so ‘out there’ with their seriously disturbed, myopic and toxic, racist obsession, exposing them is like ‘shooting ducks in a barrel.” Posted by Ngarmada, Monday, 8 March 2010 12:05:52 AM
| |
How does the fact that the media mentioned that the victim was an Indian boy turn into an accusation of racism? The simple answer is that it doesn't.
You see what you want to see... and if anybody is lying well.... Lets just say that the facts don't back you up. For the record, I'm smarter than you, I'm better educated and since I'm guessing that you were fibbing about being a doctor, I think its fair to say I'm better off. But more importantly, I'm a better person because I would never use a child's death to score cheap points in a debate. People, take a look at what he wrote in another thread: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10024&page=0 He actually uses the word "enjoy". I didn't think that this thread could stoop to new lows. But I was wrong. This child's death is a tragedy. Its got nothing to do with race or multiculturalism or anything. Its just a horrific tragedy. Show some respect. Posted by Lucy Montgomery, Monday, 8 March 2010 12:15:12 AM
| |
Lucy you try to weave your way out of it. You precisely stated "More importantly, none of the mainstream media has made this a race issue. There hasn't been any comment by the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald or the Australian that endorsed a view that this was a RACE issue."
However as I have shown above, all ot these three papers have viewed this as a race issue, that's why they have included the boys RACE in the headlines. If it's not a race issue why do they state the race? Why lucy? Why is the foreign minister in India right now? Why lucy? Because it is a RACE issue. Your comment about me using the word enjoy just demonstrates how you fail to read the whole thread before commenting. Read the comment directly behind mine by David. My comment you make reference to is in reply to your Politically correct friend David Jennings who gave examples of violent Anglo Australian crimes and asked me to enjoy. Read the thread Lucy, before you make ignorant comments. My comment is in direct response to this David Jennings said "Now here are some cases involving crime by Anglo-Australians. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2010/3.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2010/1.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWCCA/2010/13.html Enjoy" I notice again when you have no facts to base your opinions on you turn to insulting people's character. Posted by ozzie, Monday, 8 March 2010 12:42:34 AM
|
"So by that logic if a white Australian commits an act of paedophilia on a white Australian child is it a race issue?
Why can't the death of an Indian child by an Indian man simply be a horrific crime. Why do YOU have to make it into a race issue. I don't think that anybody else has so far."
Where have your been Lucy? You don't think that anybody else has made this into a race issue so far? On what planet are you? The whole of the media plus the multiculturalists have been making these crimes in Australia against Indians into race issues, trying to make out White Australians are racists. This has been happening for the last year or more.
Where have you been? At this very moment our foreign minister Mr S Smith is in India, for some reason trying to reassure the Indian PM that Indians are safe here in Australia. Why is he doing that? Because all of the media plus the multiculturalists like yourself are telling everyone that these are racist attacks on Indians and white Australians are responsible. That's why he's there Lucy, because people like YOU lie.
So I have not made this a race issue, people like YOU have. And now it is begining to backfire on you, as Australian's are finding out the truth. These crimes are indeed committed by Indians themselves.
4 of the last 5 Indians murdered here and initially blamed on white Australians have turned out to be committed by INDIANS. Face the facts Lucy. You can't or just refuse to see what is right in front of your eyes.
Oh and it does concern multiculturalism. The MC'lists such as yourself are continually bombarding the rest of Australia with the great advantages of MCísm. I am pointing out some of the obvious disadvantages. Seems only fair in a balanced debate to hear from both sides, both benefits and disadvanages, or would you prefer we do not discuss the disadvantages and focus on the lovely foods.