Well Ngarmada, I think, by the tone of your posts, you have something against White people. Therefore I think you are a racist person. If not, then definately an "ist" of some discription.

Nice try Jayb, however, to any observer, the focus of my posts is unmistakable as squarely aimed at racist bigots alike yourself, and your cohorts. For the hallmarks and symptoms of your insidious dysfunction, alike any known disease, are patently understood in our society.

As attributes in common are known to be attractive to predators of opportunity, of opportunity such as prey perceived as vulnerable, or attraction to decaying matter of parasites, such perceived opportunity further draws the like minded. It is obviously why it is appealing to those of a criminal nature.

It is also why we may readily observe the same posters consistently appearing at articles of similar issues, attempting to peddle their same malevolent, dysfunctional, dogmatic, propaganda, as predictably as sunset.

Of other definitive features of their profile, most obvious is their identifiable predilection, common to pack feeders of carrion, for organised attack upon those they consider opposition or threats. This feature is often confluent with their proclivity for manipulation. For by further definition, their agenda is illegitimate, and therefore restricted in its capacity for initiative.

They may further be discerned from right wing conservatives who, if such individuals retain similar malice, demonstrate it of far less potential, as such lesser and diminutive potential realises their capacity and acumen to retain their dysfunction as covert, if indeed it is harboured.

As appealing as the perceived opportunity to infiltrate sites such as OLO by those racists who harbour such dysfunction may be, in order to manipulate its agenda, and deceive others, for professionals, exposing this stuff is child’s play. Its potential for success is a myth. Get some therapy Jayb.

Strike another plus for Multiculturalism and strength in Diversity. Tonight another murder by an Indian. Now 4 out of the last 5 Indians murdered in Australia have been committed by Indians. Still this case was constantly presented in the media as being a racist Australian attack. Keep the Multicultural propaganda coming. I no longer believe a word of it. I wonder how the politically correct Multiculturalists will try to twist this story around. Surely it must somehow be the fault of a white Australian.

So by that logic if a white Australian commits an act of paedophilia on a white Australian child is it a race issue?

Why can't the death of an Indian child by an Indian man simply be a horrific crime. Why do YOU have to make it into a race issue. I don't think that anybody else has so far.

And why does an act of crime by one person of a racial minority on another person of a racial minority automatically invoke multiculturalism? It seems that you are conflating the issues in order to attack multiculturalism.

Given this concerning inability to rationally separate issues I really do worry for your patients

When a child has died in circumstances that are as awful as the way in which Gurshan Singh has died, what sort of person sees only a race issue? This case is as bad as the James Bulger case or the Dean Shillingsworth case.

More importantly, none of the mainstream media has made this a race issue. There hasn't been any comment by the Age, the Sydney Morning Herald or the Australian that endorsed a view that this was a race issue. So to suggest that the "media" was presenting this as a racist attack is false.

What type of person uses the death of a child to score cheap points in a debate on an internet forum?

boy! it sure was a long haul reading through all those opinions.

C.J.
Efranke gave you the commonsense obvious answer to your statement:-
"the notion of race as a biologically meaningful catergory of humans has been completely debunked by the discovery there is more genetic variation within the so called races than there is between them." He beat me to it. I suggest that the academic scientists that seek to put this up as a solution to so called racism think again.
Following their thinking this must mean that "as a species the small differences in the genetic makeup between the monkeys and man must mean "the biologically meaningful diffferences between man and ape are so insignificant as to barely lead to any determinging differences.

To the fellow who asked what race his children were. his wife being of Torrres Strait Island descent and he being of many different white race descent. The obvious answer is part Torres Strait Islander and Mixed European descent. Most people wouldn't need a science book to work that out.

To Lucy Montgomery- You are very quick to pull the I am superior and more intelligent than you because I have a University degree. Is that not what you accuse racists of doing, putting on the I am superior to you attitude. You may have a degree in one area but you are in no way any more superior or more intelligent than people who for various reasons may not have gone or had the opportunity to go to university. Isn't that a form of supremacist thinking?