WTF

I suggest that you start reading books to catch up. The ABC, MSM and Google don't cut the mustard when it comes to the truth. I'm afraid that you are too much the low information type for me to bother with any longer.

WTF?

ttbn states: The ABC, MSM and Google don't cut the mustard when it comes to the truth.

If you do not trust those organisations then go to the source material as has been suggested to you many times.

The ABC and mainstream media may provide content and commentary but if you think it is tainted then - go to the source material and read it yourself.

There are a plethora of search engines that you can you to take you to the source material if you do not trust google.

Once again - go to the source material and read it yourself.

Who does cut the mustard?

Pauline Hanson?

Or the delegates to the First Nations National Constitutional
Convention, who over 4 days near Uluru with their 250 member
Convention after 16 member Referendum Council had travelled
around the country and met with over 1,200 people. Plus in the
five years since the release of the Uluru Statement a Joint
Select Committee has considered the proposal, and an Indigenous
Voice Co-design Process has outlined in full detail all the
options of how a Voice will work.

And there's more, much more for anybody interested in the truth.
There's plenty of material in reports available - and have been
presented to Parliament to read.

As for what our PM wears or drives, et cetera?

What's that got to do with anything? Unlike some people he's
earned what he has.

I hate to say it Foxy, but the pink tie thing makes him look like more of a grovelling little white knight feminist with his female ministers standing behind him (holding the whip) than a serious leader.

WTF...

You're are right, there was quite a shake-up in the job just after the findings of the Royal Commission published it's findings. Not so much to police procedural protocols or our SOPs, rather more to do with administrative and property accountability.

Will the delegates to the Voice be elected?

If so how?

How often?

Can they be removed for any reason?

If so how and by whom?

Will they be paid? By whom? Who will decide the payment? Will there be higher payments for some? Who will appoint/elect those people?

Will dissenting voice in the Voice be given a Voice?

The longer the government and the aboriginal faction refuse to answer these type of questions with specifics as opposed to feel-good waffle, the more likely it is that they know the answers won't be acceptable.