"The link I gave earlier made it clear..."

Well I also quoted from that link, which, despite its obvious bias, inadvertently showed that it wasn't a mere technicality but a decision by 7 judges to nil that the jury had erred by not finding reasonable doubt.

I'm not blaming Brittany for going for whatever pay-day she can get from her accusations. I'm just pointing out the unbelievable hypocrisy in cancelling the trial because of her mental state and then immediately instigating another trial when there's bucks to be made.

Somebody is trying to convince a majority that they have a need for change.
The government is not keeping us posted on this issue.
I want to know...

Just who are these people?
How many of them are there?
Are they a group which has meetings?
Has it formally appointed a spokesperson?

What exactly do they want?
Why do they want it?
Will they give anything in return?
Does their ancestry have anything to do with their claim?
If so, what does their DNA tell us about them?

It seems to me we are working in the dark here.
How about a bit of light on the issue?

We cannot live in the past.
We can only learn from it.
What happened to us in the past must stay in the past.
We cannot turn back time.
We cannot bring the past in to the present, and live with it now.

mhaze,

You and I are not going to agree on the Pell case.
We see things differently. The same goes for the
Higgins/Lehrmann case. "You can lead a horse to water..."

Did you know horses are afraid of puddles - because they
can't see the bottom?

Ipso Fatso,

We can correct the past by telling the truth
about its history. And by fixing the present.
We now will have the opportunity to do so.
The information has already been provided and will
continue to be provided for everyone what this is all
about. It's available on the web.

BTW:

Here's a link for you:

http://abc.net.au/news/2012-12-09/20-year-anniversary-redfern-speech/4416732

Ipso Fatso,

I believe that people can change. The truth is not hard
to see if you open your eyes.