"You're just as determined to believe what you want about Trump
as I am. So why am I at fault - and you're not?"

Its not a question of belief. Its a question of facts and that's the difference. When Trump said there were many fine people on both sides, that was a fact. That your partisan filters sought to distort it is the basis of your belief.

Foxy,
yYou said that the US Supreme court had abolished a Constitutional right, to be a Constitutional right it must be in the Constitution.
You fail again.

Steele,
Read the above.

Dear Steele,

Thank You for explaining things further.
I thought the links I gave were quite clear and
easy to understand. I think that Is Mise does have
comprehension problems - either that or he's simply
looking for an argument. He's probably hen-pecked
at home.

As for Donald Trump?

Well, mhaze is right.
They don't hardly make 'em like him any more -
but just to be on the safe side, he should be castrated anyway.

Is Mise,

Read Steele's comments on page 6, about constitutional rights.

Dear mhaze,

Mississippi? Really?

The state where the black poverty rates are over 30% and draconian law and order is needed just to keep a lid on the place. Where the percentage of evangelical Christians is second only to Alabama, where the percentage of registered voters compared to eligible voters is at 60%, markedly below the country average, and with some of the most stringent voter ID rules.

That state?

I think there is a lot of things occupying white women voters in Mississippi. It will be interesting to see how it impacts the Legislature voting in 2023 though.

So to the broader notion of state vs federal democracy. There is little doubt that Mississippi would still be a strongly segregationist state without federal civil rights intervention. The right to an abortion really should be a civil rights issue trumping the States who wish to ban it completely.

Dear Is Mise,

No you read the above and switch your brain on.

The constitution says of the right to bear arms, it was to be done within a well regulated militia. That has been extended to individuals by the Supreme Court which ruled this shouldn't be restricted to those in a well regulated militia.

So do you regard the right of individuals to bear arms constitutional mandated even though it isn't expressly stated within the constitution?