The Forum > General Discussion > Have I got this Value of Renewables Wrong
Have I got this Value of Renewables Wrong
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The reasons that the French reactors were so cheap were mostly that they took one design that got approval and built a fleet of near-identical power plants that given France's lack of coal gas or hydro capacity, nuclear was the cheapest and most viable.
Secondly, there are presently 51 nuclear reactors presently under construction and the UK that has 2 under construction has just approved the construction of a further 6 over the next decade.
Finally, 60 years is fairly common for nuclear reactors as the reactors themselves have few moving parts. Wind turbines typically last 20 years after which the consumer has to pay for their demolition which is often not included in the cost of power.