Andras Smith said- "Murdoch, Kochs, GOP et al. are desperate to turn the 'Anglosphere' into a permanent radical right nativist libertarian nirvana, supported by authoritarianism."

Answer- Murdoch is probably much more Traditionalist than others such as most of big tech. In fact the petrol companies seem more Traditionalist than big tech. If they were really Libertarian rather than Traditionalist Andras Smith and the Socialists probably wouldn't complain so much about them. As if the socialists want to preserve the Traditional Anglosphere. If Nativism is Traditionalism then we need more- anything else is a form of social engineering and genocide- even if it's self genocide- which it's not.

I guess not everyone gets along with their own families- probably because their parents had to work so hard to support their growth- and so they've become socio-pathetic- nihilistic- negative spiral.

Hopefully the Anglosphere stops blaming their parents and grandparents for the worlds problems and stands up for their own cultural interest- ironically this will probably also save other cultures too

CM: You have unwittingly revealed a dark side of contemporary Anglosphere WASP culture, nativism and exceptionalism by citing 'traditionalism'; now couched within a Eurasian culture emerging in Australia, UK, US and Europe.

It's a core tenet, not only of Putin stooge &/or ideologue Dugin, but US Tanton Network promoting the alt right e.g. informing Fox News, GOP, Brexit, Trump etc. and including Steve Bannon, Dominic Cummings, Orban and Le Pen; also includes antipathy towards China e.g. Dugin's demand that it be 'dismantled'.

Andras Smith said- "CM: You have unwittingly revealed a dark side of contemporary Anglosphere WASP culture, nativism and exceptionalism by citing 'traditionalism'... China ... Dugin...dismantled.. Tanton Network.. fascist"

Answer-

I haven't heard a good definition of fascism- even Evola doesn't seem to define it well- the fasci is everywhere in law- axe and sticks- the fasci represents solidarity- whatever that means.

I don't think that traditionalism (or nativism if preferred) is necessarily unique to the Anglosphere or WASP culture.

I suppose Andras Smith is of the opinion that China should be supported- not that my opinion matters- but I disagree.

I don't believe that a country like China of one billion people is stable to start with- especially given the structure of China- it threatens the countries surrounding it- I can't see any solution to the China problem but division. That's not to say that I'd agree with everything that Dugin has to say about China either but we should perhaps listen to what he's got to say. Anyway I'm not sure that Dugin can be considered Anglo. I'm probably more a supporter of Deneen than Dugin- Deneen also questions the Liberal order- but he doesn't define it as illiberalism- but these labels are relative.

This seems interesting- skimmed it-
http://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2015/john-tantons-network

Wasn't the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) (bit of a misnomer) boss Morris Dees accused of the same racist behavior that he accused others- anyway everyone is prejudiced- it's seemingly necessary for survival.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Dees

For those interested- This article from the seemingly communist Stanford University that pumps graduates into "big tech" talks about Dugin and his theories- I'd prefer to read about Dugin from Dugin myself. Author- John B. Dunlop seems to have views about Solzhenitsyn- not sure whether for or against.

http://tec.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/aleksandr-dugins-foundations-geopolitics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin

Dugin has been compared to Rasputin (perhaps a crypto-communist)- I suspect that they have very different politics.

Possibly Andras Smith is working as a foreign agent- not sure why he wants to tear down Anglosphere society otherwise.

"Trump and his campaign team were so thoroughly entwined with Putin and Russian interests yet you have defended him at every turn."

That's quite the assertion. If only there was a brass razoo of evidence to support it. You know, like a coupla hundred gigabits of emails, documents, pictures and videos on, say, a laptop which proved the point. But alas no such thing exists as regards Trump. Biden on the other hand....

Of course the lack of evidence didn't stop the usual suspects conducting a 2 year $32 million investigation into the Trump collusion....which found no evidence. But the usual dills don't need evidence to 'know' its true, while at the same time 'knowing' that all the evidence detrimental to Biden should be ignored because of ....[insert your favourite reason].

Reasons like those espoused by Andras Smith. It doesn't matter that the laptop is real. It doesn't matter that various government groups are looking into how badly the revelations in the laptop compromise the US. It doesn't matter that the information in the laptop shows the first family being compromised by the enemies of the US. No , for Andras all that matters is that the wrong people are reporting it. The path to the truth it's not.

Mhaze,

I think SR's comments show how easy it is to impeach a president. The supposed Russian connection was investigated by the FBI and found to be baseless.

The Democrats' basis for impeaching Trump was entirely based on that they didn't like him.

A question.

What Anglosphere?

And where exactly is it?