Hi Paul,

Do you actually read what mhaze posts?

He's a bloke who
supported Trump, Cardinal Pell, Christian Porter,
Israel, and now Putin? No surprises there. The list goes on.
He's not got anything right yet.
No wonder people like Steele, Nathan, and
others, find him entertaining. He's good for a laugh.
And CM will send him kudos. Can't ask for more.

mhaze,

If democratic elections had been held in Vietnam early on Ho Chi Minh and his Nationalists would have rompted in. The Yanks knew that, so they denied the Vietnamese the right to self determination. An illegitimate Yankee backed puppet regime was installed in the South. The Soviets and China had no interest in propagating the war to any great extent, committing nothing more than advisers and materials. Unlike the Yanks who poured in half a million men at a time, and billions in materials. The dirty American War cost millions of lives. Finally the Yanks skipped out of Vietnam with their tails between their legs.

Now now children, let's try to be adults here.

Paul first. You said "by the end of it no one really knew what it was all about" and now you're telling me what it was all about. Logic takes a holiday? We might not agree on what Vietnam was about but, it seems, we now agree that you were wrong to say no one knew what it was about.

Paul also..."koalas, another subject you know nothing about."

Yet when I pointed out koalas were so rare that it was ten years before the the European settlers saw their first, Paul went off and proved that the first koala was sighted in 1798. It seems it was beyond poor old Paul's maths skills to calculate that 1798 was ten years after 1788.

Foxy seems rather miffed that I pointed out she'd lifted whole paragraphs from a BBC article and pretend they were her own. She does this very regularly and I only point it out occasionally. It seems she's just desperate to appear erudite and learned by copying erudite and learned wording.

Hilariously Foxy thinks I was wrong when I opined Pell was innocent. Seems she's forgotten he was found....ahem, innocent. And now that I won't buy into to her anti-Putin tantrum, she thinks that means I'm pro-Putin. No middle ground in Foxy-land.

Even funnier that the girl who fell more than anyone in the group for RussiaGate thinks I never get anything right.

Sadly they are both hoping for the return of SR to bolster their self-esteem. Would it be crass to point out that SR has quietly withdrawn after I found him out in making a series of errors on WuFlu statistics?

mhaze,

You poor man, grabbing at straws again.
Tsk. Tsk. Cardinal Pell was not exonerated.
He got off on a legal technicality. And you
certainly have not been right yet - on this
forum. But you can keep trying - although
I don't like your chances. But hey - miracles
do happen.

"And you
certainly have not been right yet"

Was I right about you lifting whole paragraphs from a BBC article and passing it off as your own?

mhaze,

I make notes from a great deal of sources and it's
not intentional. I research a lot. Most of the time
I do try to be consistent and either give links or
acknowledge where the information came from. But I
am only human and do make mistakes.

However, that's
the difference between us. I don't go around nit-picking
people's posts or how much they may have quoted from
someone else. To me that's a sign that you don't have
any other way to win an argument so you resort to
using these pathetic tactics and attempts at personal
slurs.

Sad really. What would you do if you didn't have me to pick on?
Although I imagine you'd find someone else to try to bully.
You must be a joy to live with. Or perhaps your family tends
to ignore you and you come on here to vent your spleen.
Makes sense.