The Forum > General Discussion > Australian Choice
Australian Choice
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Page 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
David F comment 1- US should not have interfered
Answer 1-
The US had to interfere because power is based on oil- for now- but some are more sane than others. Without dominance instability ensues.
David F comment 2- Panama Canal to give up to Panama.
Answer 2- The US or similar needs to control the Panama Canal because
The Panama Canal (Suez) is global consumer critical infrastructure without which tyranny and cost of goods will increase by an order of magnitude. China now controls Kenya's ports. Maybe we'll see a 'new spice road' age. In a sense "what is necessary is right" "quod est necessarium est licitum". I suspect that sans the US 'the bankers' (and those groups that hold dominance in the banks) think they will be in control.