The Forum > General Discussion > Australian Choice
Australian Choice
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Page 43
- 44
- 45
-
- All
Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 30 January 2022 10:05:38 PM
| |
To make it a fair fight the pigs should have guns as well. I don't approve, but take care anyway.
I can just recall the old grandfather and uncle going pig shooting. They were known to bring home little ones they called, "squalliers", fatten them up in a pen for the table. Don't know how they caught them, but they did. Does anyone do that today? Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 31 January 2022 6:16:11 AM
| |
Is Mise,
You obviously have not read Section 44 of our Constitution which is an anachronism that states our Members of Parliament cannot sit in Parliament if they give allegiance to a foreign entity. We've recently had that fiasco where many of our MPs had to resign their positions because it was found that they had dual citizenship either by birth or ancestry. Yet they are required to give an Oath of Allegiance to a British ruler. Not an Australian - no matter what title you give her. She is still a British Queen. That is very relevant and that part of our Constitution ( as well as many other parts) needs to be amended. Anyway, I'm done in arguing with you Posted by Foxy, Monday, 31 January 2022 7:46:06 AM
| |
Is Mise,
You really should read these three links: http://theconversation.com/enough-is-enough-on-section-44-its-time-for-reform-102708 http://theconversation.com/the-section-44-soap-opera-why-more-mps-could-be-in-danger-of-being-forced-out-116955 http://theconversation.com/view-from-the-hill-section-44-remains-a-constitutional-trip-wire-that-should-be-addressed-115435 Posted by Foxy, Monday, 31 January 2022 9:37:22 AM
| |
I'm going to repeat what I wrote earlier.
If we become a republic we could create a modern set of legislation that makes the power of the Head of State explicit and clear and provides checks and balances in case their power was abused. We could make sure a Head of State was answerable to the people in every way. There is literally no advantage in having a monarch other than as I said before "tradition." The only positive a monarch brings to Australian society is the concept of tradition. Denying women a vote was traditional as well, imprisoning homosexuals was tradition. Executing people was traditional. Not recognizing the Indigenous community as citizens was traditional. Tradition has never prevented us from kaing positive changes. It shouldn't now. Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 2 February 2022 3:51:57 PM
| |
I think Foxy is working for a foreign power. Paraphrasing Marx- if you want to destroy a people destroy their traditions. Do you feel yourself becoming more powerless?
Posted by Canem Malum, Thursday, 3 February 2022 11:40:59 PM
|
I’m off pig hunting for the next two weeks, do read the Constitution and learn.