last try:

http://newyorker.com/magazine/2021/07/05/kyle-rittenhouse-american-vigilante

Foxy Very interesting, but have you watched the videos yet?

Issy, you haven't answered re; my concerns about self defence. After all you raised it in the first place, despite what some infantile closet Nazi has to say.

Paul,
And you haven’t answered mine re. Principle 7 of the Greens’.

The OP raised the question of self defence, the whole thing is about self defence.

Thank you Foxy, for finding the article from the New Yorker. I agree that he was reckless even going to the event. I just don't think that anyone loses their right to self defence, just because they were stupid.

In any case,the people who set a dumpster on fire and rolled it towards a service station are far more reckless. I hope they get charged.

That is a cop out Issy I answered your question on p7.

Principle 7 of NSW Greens policy on Firearms reads;

"7. That personal protection should never be regarded as a genuine reason for owning, possessing or using a firearm."

That is a policy I totally agree with. What you believe is people should posses a firearm in advance on the pretext its only for self protection. The notion that one uses a firearm and then claims its is only for self protection is erroneous.

For my trouble I copped a serve from sh!thouseminister, now how about you answer my question.