The Forum > General Discussion > Cop-26 end deforestation agreement
Cop-26 end deforestation agreement
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I like trees. I bought a bare, over grazed ex turf farm 30 years ago. It had 6 trees total. I planted 140 trees & similar number of shrubs around the 1.5 acre house paddock, & 250 down the paddock. Nature mostly birds planted a few hundred more. More than half have survived. I struggled keeping some, like the 100 Chinese Empress, [Paulownia tomentosa] alive through years of drought, only to have them all die of root rot the first wet year, obviously unsuitable for here. I planted a few Silky Oaks, [Grevillea robusta], & as soon as they produced seed, the birds planted them everywhere. They love the place.
A weed is any plant in the wrong place. Some had to go, because I had planted the wrong tree in that place, others because the birds had done the same. However we now have a couple of acres of Silky Oaks, to produce cabinet timber, & may plant another 10 or so. Also a few acres of Lemon myrtle for oil & lemon tea production, plus some in bags for the nursery trade. Both these are indigenous to the area.
Still I have removed a few hundred that were in the wrong place, generating nice clumps of shelter & shade, but I have had to remove hundreds in 30 years, including many declared noxious weeds. My worry is that I will have some bureaucrat telling me I can't choose to remove any trees at all, & even I can't harvest trees I have planted for that purpose. It has happened before, when bureaucrats are empowered.