Last year Inclusive Australia’s ‘Measuring Social Inclusion’ survey showed that 60% of respondents "believed that White Australians were the victims of discrimination to some extent”. 73% agreed that it was an important issue,

As a result of governments pushing multiculturalism and — more recently — the Black Lives Matter movement and neo-Marxist inspired critical race theory - white Australians are increasingly targeted as racist and xenophobic. This in itself is racism on the part of non-whites, and many self-hating, guilty-tripping whites scrambling onto the virtue signalling band wagon.

Since Gough Whitlam was prime minister and Al Grasby the minister for immigration, the school curriculum has taught students Australian society is inherently racist. In schools these days, Western civilisation is either ignored or seen as inherently oppressive and racist, according to Australian educator, Kevin Donnelly. "White Australians feel embattled".

At Sydney University, 150 academics knocked back funding to establish a centre to study Western civilisation. In fact, according to these wonderful people, the existing curriculum should be "purged of whiteness as existing subjects like history, literature, art and music are guilty of “racism, sexism, classism, historical injustice and prejudice based on religion”.

"In the case of White Australians the campaign for tolerance, in fact, has led to intolerance" (Donnelly).

It is not surprising that the largely Leftist media did not publicise this survey.

Well that view sits well with the developers paradise created by our politicians.

It’s growing ever closer to the time where they will divide Chinese into good and bad ones, for the purposes of flooding the country with wealthy potential property tycoons.

Just another layer of foreign dominance ensuring the status quo for increasingly poverty stricken whites.

There are many losers with multiculturalism. Over two hundred languages and dialects are spoken in the Western suburbs of Sydney. My ear to the ground tells me Chinese are most unpopular in that region.

Things are bad, but they are bound to get worse, my guess.

Dan

Thanks for raising this issue ttbn.

It's been said that where your rights end mine don't begin.

In an argument there can be two bad sides.

Yes Marxist inspired Critical Race Theory (CRT). CRT is an interesting thing- it seems to be made up of two parts 1. The observation of Cultural Relativism 2. The solution to Cultural Relativism being that of Communist Cultural Hegemony (or cultural dominance and destruction).

Cultural Relativism isn't controversial.

Cultural Hegemony is the atomization of humanity. A form of totalitarianism that is scarcely able to be imagined due to it's total horror.

In cultural hegemony there are no ethnicities, no sexes, no families, no ancestors, no descendants, no communities, no food, no literature- to create a blank slate world- because these are the beginnings of inequality.

The means by which the blank state is attained is by permanent revolution (see Leon Trotsky) against the traditional structure of society in successive waves by a "benevolent" tyrant enobled with the power of life and death.

The problem with the blank slate world is that it doesn't have meaning- everything is about the world state.

Humans are not insects ruled by a tyrant.

There needs to be a quantitative balance between local and mass rule. Ethnicity has evolved to satisfy this need.

White males are just the first wave that Trotsky wants to destroy.

The proposed study of Western Civilisation was just a dog whistle to advertise and promote the principle of White Supremacy.

Likewise the complaint about teaching "black armband" view of history or CRT is to deny the whole truth of history to following generations and displays a level of immaturity and insecurity. What is there to be scared of?

Somehow the white privileged majority that rules Western countries always paints itself as the victim and needs to blame some targetted minority for its own shortcomings - typically a racial group that is easily identified.

Dividing people up into warring groups and provoking internal conflict is how populations are controlled and diverted from applying scrutiny to their leaders.

There was a cartoon I saw that showed a King under siege by angry peasants who were holding torches or pitchforks. In order to save himself he started the rumour to tell the pitchfork-holders that the torch-holders wanted to take their pitchforks away.
Simple.

Good comments, Dan and CM.