The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Why free speech warriors from both sides should wish Jordan Shanks well in his court case.

Why free speech warriors from both sides should wish Jordan Shanks well in his court case.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
"I would be happy to bet that JS will not win this case."

Jordan Shanks odds of winning have just shortened. The forums resident Wally Rumpole has declared for Pork Barrels! After his failed claims about 'Beat Up' Bolt and 'Cry Baby' Porter he might land the trifecta!
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 20 September 2021 5:57:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pauliar,

After your continuous lying about what I said about Porter and Bolt, the fact that you support this twit has doomed him.
Posted by shadowminister, Tuesday, 21 September 2021 5:51:59 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
shonkysinister,

Why does Porter need a secret slush fund to pay his debts, when you said he was in for 10 million bucks.
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 21 September 2021 6:41:34 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pauliar,

Because once again you are lying.
Posted by shadowminister, Tuesday, 21 September 2021 6:44:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shadowminister,

You wrote: "Firstly as there was no trial, I was not incorrect. Secondly, the ABC made an apology clearly stating that they never intended to imply guilt on CP and paid for the mediation because they knew that they would lose the case."

Porter lost the case. He withdrew it because he didn't want the materials for his case to be made public.

The ABC's story remains unchanged and online for all the world to see.

The ABC paid a small amount for mediation as it was they who sought it.

Anyway it was the case brought by the victim's friend which has cost Porter the most and is the reason why he was reduced to taking blind money and forced him to resign.

A far different result from what you predicted and hoped for isn't it.
Posted by SteeleRedux, Tuesday, 21 September 2021 8:16:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
SR,

The case cannot be lost if it hasn't been heard. The ABC declared it would mount a truth defence then ended up essentially confessing that any implication that Porter committed rape was complete bollocks.

Considering that my prediction was conditional on there being a trial and there was no trial. And I said that the trial could end up costing the ABC $10m as a similar recent trial. Again no trial.

Compare this to your crowing about Pell's guilt just before he was exonerated.

The skanks trial will be more of a slam dunk considering that JS is continuing accusing JB of corruption without a shred of evidence.
Posted by shadowminister, Tuesday, 21 September 2021 2:55:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy