Mr uneducated,

"The ABC reported on a letter detailing the allegations against Porter sent by anonymous friends. The lesser known part of the letter is that the parents of the woman “worried that she may have confected or embellished the allegations due to her mental illness”. She withdrew her police complaint before she died."

Which in layman's terms is pretty much a confession by the "alleged" victim that part or all of the accusation was fabricated.

The confession is by the parents that the rape claim was probably fabricated.

P.S. The PM has indicated that any investigation into claims of rape will include other MPs such as Bill Shorten. Will it include Wong and SHY too?

shifty & shady minister,

You are trying to avoid my comment.

I asked if Porter had sexual intercourse with the claimant and would be willing to undergo a polygraph test.

I just found this on the news:

http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/sexual-assault-counsellor-says-christian-porters-accuser-told-her-of-alleged-rape-eight-years-ago/ar-BB1el9js?li=AAgfYrC

Looks to me like the claimant truly believed she had been raped.

Why would she lie?

Because she was a mental case!
Or do I have it wrong?
And what about this memory recall BS?
It has been critcised by the psychiatric community as being a flawed theory, and absolutely NOT accepted or recognised as a recommended form of medical treatment.
So therefore, UNWORTHY of relevance.

I'm curious as to why the claimant would have lied.

Why would she make up a story about something that just did not happen?

It just doesn't make sense to me. I think there's something not right.

Did she just imagine it happened? After all it was a long time ago and her memory of what happened or didn't happen must have been very poor after 32 years.

The only person who now knows what happened or didn't happen is Porter.

Unless of course there is a third person who has firsthand knowledge of what happened or didn't happen.