Paul,

The article WASN'T just about Buzzfeed.

For example, it said....

"I have been galled watching my former colleagues speak out, yet were silent bystanders when I endured such horrendous treatment," Ms Husar wrote in her letter.

"The Labor Party cannot pretend that poor treatment of women exists on only one side of the political divide."

And much more.....

Standard operating procedure there from Paul. Looks at an issue with his eyes closed and then claims he can't see any problems.

Andrew Bolt is the only public commentator who has twigged that Scott Morrison plays identity politics and race politics when he is under pressure. Morrison wants ‘more women’. Let’s hope they do a better job than Reynolds and the others he has now. Bolt rightly says that he doubts that a man performing as badly as Reynolds would still be in the job.

On the race card, Bolt recalls Morrison’s frantic defence of Gladys Liu, branding anyone criticising the woman as “racist”.

The ChineseCommunist Party’s paper, the ‘Global Times’, praised Morrison for calling Australians who faulted Liu ‘racists’.

“Scotty from marketing” - Bolt’s words - is starting to fray around the edges, revealing what he is really like, unsuitable leader material. His recent speech fawning over women was too sickening to continue watching.

Newspoll might have him at 62% popularity to Albanese’s 26%, but that might not mean much, now that Morrison has lost the one seat majority for his appalling treatment of Kelly, and the party-choice poll is at 50/50.

I am relieved to see Hasbeen, as one of the few who still has the courage of his conviction to tell it like it is.
I for one, by nature, abhor PC and those who simply follow the rest of the herd, because of a lack of courage, and conviction, and are afraid of being virtue shamed.
Women are NOT a liberal party problem at all, because they don't hire women based on virtue signaling or pressure from irrelevant groups or people.
As Hasbeen has rightly pointed out, when one looks back at the stats, women have been an abysmal failure, and don't bother pointing out the odd one that has barely hung in there, by the grace of MALE colleagues.
The problem IS in the fact that a female does not project, nor is a authorative figure.
PC has destroyed the natural order of things, and the weak and gutless amongst us have allowed the loud and more aggressive minorities to rise and prosper, against all that is natural.
A case in point, when I was debating/arguing/discussing the rights and status of women, in a similar debate as this one, she said "women had to fight tooth and nail to get to where we are today".
My response was for her to think about what she had just said, and my point was, if you had to fight tooth and nail to get something, then it is patently clear, you were not meant to have it.
The world has been going against nature now for some decades.
What some like to call progress, I have seen it as regress.
Just think back to some of the ridiculous decisions made in the past, and you will realise that we now have the inmates running the asylum.

There was a sociologist who specialises in sexual abuse on ABC news this morning who said that 1 in 3 people do not believe women who claim to be rape victims while in fact only 5% of these women have actually been proven not to be telling the truth.

We should ask Jen.

Now, now boys Paulo, tt, Mopi.

If I had my way I'd leave OLO comment threads clean, righteous and uncluttered by

CENSORING THE LOT OF YOU.

Happy?
____________________________

As to you Mr Hasbean

Was it not Mr Yoshiro Mori (oriental, like Mopi) who Was Tokyo Olympics President, but then sadly forced to stand down after saying

"Women talk too much".

And then he was replaced by a WOMAN?!

What is Japan's Kamikaze, Samerai, Salaryman culture coming to? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salaryman

Your Lord

Pete

Plantagenet, you give a very poignant yet strong example of PC and how it has invaded the minds of many to the point where it is now so corrosive, it is eating away at the very fabric of what it means to be, a society.
The core values have been attacked and ravaged to suite the agenda of a very loud and aggressive, mis-guided few.
Why is it that the many are forced into submission by the few?
As for women and their standing in society, no-one ever accused women of anything before all this rubbish started.
Women were valued for what/who they were, just like anyone else, not as equals or betters or worse even.
They were people, like everyone else.
Now, for no good reason, we are supposed to hold women to such a high level of esteem that even the women get light headed if placed in that rarified air.
One of the most appropriate phrases/comments I have heard, was; The man is the authorative figure, the woman, his support.
This came from the original findings of strengths and weaknesses of women, which begins with child birth.
From there, by the law of nature she would proceed, instinctively to the nurturing and caring stage.
The male/father was the disciplinarian, but only after the child was at an age of reasoning.
Nowhere has it ever been written or recorded that the mother should give birth and then as soon as possible begin a whole raft of un-natural acts and scenarios which means, having given birth, she's off, back to posing and her selfish, "look at moi", lifestyle.
NO, I don't care what the PC brigade or the feminazi's have to say.
As far as I am concerned mother nature is our guide not mother-f.....rs.
Another of my predictions is that women will start to see where they have gone wrong, and in time, nature and common sense and reason will win out, and women will start getting back to being wives and mothers, NOT CEO's and something they are completely unnecessary and unsuitable for.