Foxy,

You just gave mhaze a sociological tongue lashing and he hasn't got a clue if you were criticizing him or complimenting him.

Dear Paul,

I guess we shall always have negative types who
as I keep repeating will suck positivity,
optimism, and energy out of others. I've gotten to
the stage where I seriously have to ask- "Why am
I even bothering to engage with these people?"
The answer is - I shouldn't bother any more.
There are enough people on this forum with whom
I can engage. I'll try to do just that.

Mr O,

I have no control over what mhaze has or doesn't have
a clue about. And frankly I don't care.

Dear Paul,

Did you happen to watch Q & A last night (26/10/2020)?

The topic was - Accountability, Ethics, and Leadership.

And the panel was comprised of:

Ken Henry - former Treasury Secretary.
Dave Sharma - Liberal member for Wentworth.
Tanya Plibersek - Shadow Minister for education.
Simon Longstaff - Executive Director, The Ethics Centre.
Dani Larkin - lawyer, Uluru Dialogue Leadership Group.

It was a great panel and the topics were great. We got
various perspectives to the questions being asked by people.
Dani Larkin was particularly interesting. She gave an
easy to understand account of what the Uluru Statement from
The Heart was all about. She explained it in simple terms
for the average person. Which I'm sure many people would
have appreciated.

Hi Foxy,

Yes I did, one of the best Q & A's for the year, great panel, all five. Dani Larkin brought up a good point, the 'Uluru Statement From
The Heart' was a gift to all Australians, not a list of demands from the Indigenous minority. So many conservative white Australians fear the succession of legitimate rights to our Indigenous brothers and sisters through a voice to parliament will be a sign of weakness on our part, totally unjustified, nothing could be further from the truth.

Hi Paul,

Yes she explained things so well. And like Tanya Plibersek,
I totally support Dani in what she is trying to achieve.
I think we all should.