The Forum > General Discussion > The Questionable Nature of Australian Parliaments
The Questionable Nature of Australian Parliaments
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
That was disturbing as I did not think that was his business in parliament. Having parliamentarians make recommendations for capital expenditures can lead to political maneuvering and corruption as money can be directed where it would result in votes.
It seems to me that public funds in Queensland would be better disbursed if a nonpartisan commission examined the needs of the state and directed funds where they are most needed.
I have never received a communication from a parliamentarian telling me of his or her view on public policy or legislation, participation in debates or committees or any other information to do with her or his parliamentary duties. They may communicate irrelevant matters such as interest in sporting groups or participation in religious activities. They are great at remembering the fallen in past wars and ignoring the wise individuals whose advice would have kept us out of those wars.
In general parliamentarians do not support or oppose legislation on the basis of their feelings, knowledge or the wishes of their community. In the words of William Gilbert, “I always voted at my party’s call and I never thought of thinking for myself at all.”
I think Australia is a great place to live in spite of the questionable nature of Australian parliaments.