pseudo-Josephus,

You're the one being dishonest about the science and the one who the scientific community is calling wrong.

Not Me!

SR

So what's the relevant data set to know whether or not any given climate policy is justified?

Do you think your hopeless floundering is not obvious?

Come on. You're supposed to represent science here. Mr Opinion admits he can't answer the challenge cause he doesn't have the faintest idea what he's talking about.

So answer the question.

You people are a joke - the useful idiots of your manipulators who couldn't give a sh!t whether you live or die, and yet you can't lick their arses enough pfffffft.

Cumberland,

The scientific community is saying the exact opposite to what you are saying about AGW / climate.

Have you wondered as to why that is so?

One of you has to be wrong.

Have a guess who it is.

Mr O how can you be so sure who is wrong. You do not know the science and cannot debate the science.

Josephus,

You are absolutely wrong.

I am an environmental sociologist researching what scientists and scholars have to say about AGW / climate.

As such I have a very good understanding of what they say is happening.

They are saying that the adverse current climate change is the result of anthropogenic global warming which is produced by the burning of fossil fuels.

You and people like you, which we group together as AGW / climate deniers, think that the scientific community is dishonest and untrustworthy and is making up lies about global warming and climate change.

Obviously you cannot both be right.

Mr Opinion,
That is not debating the science, it is merely chanting your mantra. Post the evidence and the calculations that prove humans are causing Global warming.