The Forum > General Discussion > Preservation of species
Preservation of species
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- ...
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Do you think it would be a better world if humans would disappear? I'm in favour of it but others first.
Answer-
Good question
I would like to see humans reduce world population to levels at least under a billion- then do a review. This would take some of the pressure off the natural world and between cultural segments of humanity. And we would still be much better off than we were going the other way through the one billion milestone. This is a 90% reduction in the world population especially given the world population is likely (median estimate) to be over 11 Billion by the end of the century. There will be a lot of problems achieving this goal.
This question touches on the concept as to whether humans are naturally virtuous or not- is man naturally good or bad- from memory this argument also appears between Hobbes/ Locke (ironically both influential in Liberal thought- so perhaps Platonic philosophers should be included here) and Xunzi and Mencius (of Confucian thought).
If humans are naturally "bad"- then perhaps one could naively assert that it would be best that humans disappear. However Hobbes and Xunzi on the "bad side" believed that man could become virtuous through the influence of a virtuous society