Cont...

He then continued his training in South Africa where; “Hatfill submitted his PhD thesis for examination to Rhodes in January 1995, but it was failed in November and no degree was ever granted. Hatfill later claimed a Ph.D. degree in "molecular cell biology" from Rhodes, as well as completion of a post-doctoral fellowship (1994–95) at the University of Oxford in England and three master's degrees (in microbial genetics, medical biochemistry, and experimental pathology). Some of these credentials have been questioned. During a later investigation, officials at Rhodes insisted that he had never been awarded a Ph.D. from their institution.”

Do we have a pattern yet?

His own lawyer admitted that Hatfield; "Puffed on his resume. Absolutely. Forged a diploma. Yes, that's true."

So does he have form against medical evidence? Yup.

“In 2014, Hatfill publicly criticized the response of U.S. public health authorities to the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa and suggested that it is possible that Ebola could be transmitted by aerosol, an assertion which other experts have disputed; ] his views on this have been characterized as misrepresentations of the primary scientific literature by other experts."

So who else do you have for me? I'm not sure where you dig these characters up from but they certainly are entertaining.

The question is why on earth would you expect anyone to believe a word out of this bloke's mouth? You really are living with the fringe dwellers now mate, and it isn't pretty, though it is a laugh.

A few more studies to be ignored:

Iacoviello et al. Early HCQ reduced mortality by 30%

Yu et al ..."Authors suggest that HCQ treatment should be started as soon as possible."

Davido et al .... HCQ+AZ Reduce mortality by 45%.

etc etc

Thanks for checking this bloke out, Steele.

Whatever works, let it be cautiously be tested on a wider scale, or improved if possible. If it has side-effects, put it aside, or fund improvements in it. If it doesn't work as its spruikers claim, or does harm without doing any good, send them the bill for any costs.

Cheers,

Joe

Yes. It is reportedly efficacious in case of malaria, and at least one scientists has discovered malarial elements in the Chinese virus. But as long as people stick to the fiction that the virus is down to bats, not actually made-in-China, the truth will never see the light of day.

This passage from and article by Peter O'Brien is interesting:

" …. hydroxychloroquine ….. is increasingly being shown to be both safe and effective, despite the categorical statement by our CMO Dr Paul Kelly that ‘it doesn’t work' to provide cover for pusillanimous politicians and alarmist scientists to justify their past misjudgements ……".

Amen.

SR,

So the data is wrong because of who reports it? Pretty standard SR there. Hatfill was just a small part of the article I linked. It shows just how desperate you are that that's the best (or worst) you could come up with.

Also just to fill out Hatfill's resume, a few things you missed. Of course I'm not suggesting you deliberately hid these things because they didn't suit your purposes - no SR would never do that....(smile).

Hatfill, while accused by Mueller as part of the FBI probe into the anthrax attacks, was totally exonerated and paid $4million in compensation for false harassment.

He "worked (1997–99) as a civilian researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), the U.S. Department of Defense's medical research institute for biological warfare (BW) defense at Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland. There he studied, under a National Research Council fellowship, new drug treatments for the Ebola virus and became an authority on BW defense."

"He was appointed an adjunct assistant professor of emergency medicine at the George Washington University Medical Center in 2010."

But none of that really matters. The nature of the messenger isn't the point. The only issue is whether the 53 studies he mentions are valid or not....I assume you won't understand that type of thinking.