(Continued)

Which leads to the pridictions. Oh the horror stories of the pridictions. Let's just avoid the issue completely and say there are two stories going on. One that pridicts a massive fallout somewhere and a fallout soon, and the other pridicts a range of range of tempatures to increase, and they have a complex to looking graph to show the many different predicted tempature ranges without much data to point to their reliability. If that doesn't scream con job to you, then I don't know what does.

The issues with climite science is that there are no reliable readings. And the closest enviornment to match the highschool experiment of CO2 in a tube measuring tempature, is a city wide use of cars and electricity creating more smog and more heat in a condensed area. There is no atmospheric issues that we can record, and as far as I know there is no reliable data of tempature fluctions away from city wide island heat effects.

The data points to the island heat effect. Namely localized polution, heat increased by heat sources from buildings, and lack of greenery. Not to global climate change.

Wake up and open your eyes Steele. It sucks but the whole thing around climate change doesn't add up. I use to believe in it till I paid attention enough to see the holes. We take crap care of the enviornment and the world around us, and that battle for for being more enviornmental conscience is a worthy while cause. However that battle is a localized one. Cleaning up your trash, taking care of your city and possibly looking for ways to cool the island heat effect around the cities is the only real issue. It's not a global one. Unless you consider where the trash goes. (Ocean dumping). But that's not global warming either, that is trash management and poisoning the area with trash, not tempature increasing.

Co2 in the upper atmosphere is trash and needs not be there.

For all those who have brains that simply cant handle math, & those who are too damn lazy to bother trying, there is one simple fact that must scream confidence trick.

All the "authorities, NASA, The Oz weather bureau, & the equivalent in the UK, France, Germany, & many other western nations are continually homogenising, & otherwise bastardising, the weather statistics.

Any right thinking person would have to wonder just why every "correction" to the official record always somehow reduces the temperature of the older records, by up to a couple of degrees. Most of the warming claims by the con artists are in those "corrections", not in any actual temperature readings.

Anyone who doesn't start to smell the rat in the woodpile in these "corrections", is just too dumb to bother talking to, or has skin in the scam.

Dear Hasbeen and NNS,

You two are regulars Bill and Bens.

One says in his wilfully ignorant rant that it can all be explained away by the 'heat island effect' without any regard to the serious efforts by weather departments to account for it by 'homogenising data', but to the other this homogenising effort makes the temperature record completely unreliable.

Tell you what, why don't the both of you go into a little room and sort out what it is to be. Is adjusting the raw temperature data to account for the heat island effect acceptable or not?

Lunacy writ large.

With it being so cold so early in the year BOM are going to have to find another way to fiddle the data for 2020. Maybe Steelie could give them some advice on how to deny the facts.

A month or two means nothing. We are talking since 1950 in AU. Atmospheric co2 has never been bigger.