Chris it has nothing to do with opinion, & everything to do with real scientific fact.

The type of research we see from James Cook is typical of the concocted bullsh1t that comes out of those riding the gravy train of global warming caused by a very minor trace gas.

You know the stuff, CO2 is making fish all left handed, & making them less scared of predators.

If you remember climategate, & who could forget it, you can only agree the whole thing is a fraud.

please send the link to Greta. That is where the 'experts' get their advice.

So many different stories on everything! Who to believe? As none of us knows any of these experts, or bullshite artists, as many of them might be, it's best to ignore the lot of them. Whatever happens, we mere mortals, and the experts or the BS artists can't do a thing about anything it. We will all die of old age or one of the many diseases available, one day. So, who gives a damn about any of it!

The paper is at http://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/50461/ and its only mention of CO2 is a statement that their calculations assume a constant concentration of 400ppm. It's a technical paper relating to cloud composition in the arctic (not representative of the whole planet) investigating the role of clouds as (which they acknowledge are a feedback mechanism) in the arctic experiencing more than twice as much warming as the global average.

Hasbeen, I meant to state link between co2 and global warming.

have the warmist religion dropped the peak oil scare. They were banging on about that in the 1970's. Oh well just another hopelessly flawed prediction based on corrupt models.