Is Victoria's GG Jill Hennessy a fit and proper person given her vicious attempt to punish people she disagrees with?

As for Adam Bent, is this sanctimonious ponce a fit and proper person?

Josephus,

"believe Pell guilty have gone to Jill Hennessy to have Bettina's honour stripped. Note who is behind the action; Ms Batty"

Hearsay on your part, where is your evidence, or are you making it up?

ALTRAV, Your support for a pair of convicted paedophiles in Pell and Harris, blaming the victims, one as young as nine. Where do you get off.
Anyone else agree with ALTRAV that Pell and Harris are nothing more than misunderstood victims.

SM; lock up your daughters, Bonking Barney is on the prowl once more.

Paul, if you can't make the distinction or separation in understanding what I have said, ask your five your old grandchild, I'm sure they can explain it to you.
Oh and by the way, I make/made NO mention of Pell in my comments.
Seeing as how you enjoy breaking peoples stones over irrelevant and trivial drivel.
I tell you what, I believe you've heard these pathetic left whinge mates of yours go on about when you say something there are consequences, well here it is;
If you can find where I mentioned, let alone defended Pell, I will make an open apology to the forum.
BUT if you can't find any evidence of what essentially is your sick and twisted imagination or Aspergers kicking in, then YOU will stop making stupid and personal attacks and comments about the messenger and stick to the message.
Sound fair to you?
Now off you go and find this reference to Pell, there's a good lad.
Oh that's right, because you're such a wealth of information and a pillar of something, I see you haven't responded to my question; did you witness these charges and allegations being leveled at these guys, or are you just another "YES MAN" and a subscriber to the "ME TOO" maggots fraternity?

ALTRAV asks;

If you can find where I mentioned, let alone defended Pell, I will make an open apology to the forum.

"The argument that a jury of 12 convicted him (Pell), is little to no comfort to us, as it has already been said, judging by the details of the trial, this has been one heck of a judicial stuff-up.
And as has been mentioned, NO I do not have faith in the people to make the right decision."

Posted by ALTRAV, Monday, 4 March 2019 1:35:55 AM

Paul, before I submit, you make no reference to where and when or which topic I said this, because I cannot find any mention of Pell in my previous comments on this thread, which is the article I/we are commenting on.
If you are quoting some other article, then we must take all the material in context, rather than quote or highlight one passage or sentence.
My earlier posting on Pell was based on the fact that he had been convicted by the press and the public, before he even was charged, let alone gone to court.
And yes if that was the case of my posting, then I stand steadfast behind my words.
Whether he fiddled some kids or not, he was denied a fair trial because of too many jelly brains and neuters who are too emotional to be of any use even to themselves, so how can we expect them to be of maturity, stature and legally conversant to make any of life's decisions let alone legal or moral ones.
So before YOU pass judgement on anyone, know ALL the facts and truths, which is not possible to do, so one cannot/must not make a judgement, until those criteria are met.
In which case Pell should not be found guilty.
Now if you can't follow the reasoning or legality, that's your problem.

ALTRAV; a unanimous jury verdict on 11 December 2018 in Melbourne’s county court, found Pell guilty of sexually penetrating a child under the age of 16, as well as four charges of an indecent act with a child under the age of 16.

"The argument that a jury of 12 convicted him (Pell), is little to no comfort to us, as it has already been said, judging by the details of the trial, this has been one heck of a judicial stuff-up.
And as has been mentioned, NO I do not have faith in the people to make the right decision."

The above defence of Pell was posted by you on the discussion, 'Pell: Disgraceful Decision' Monday, 4 March 2019 1:35:55 AM. Approximately one week after the jury verdict was known. There was no judicial stuff-up, that was a deflection of the guilty verdict by you. BTW it was a unanimous verdict.

Now you ask; If you can find where I mentioned, let alone defended Pell, I will make an open apology to the forum.

Failing to make an apology, now you have been shown defending Pell, I would label you sir a liar.