I truly hope that little smart arse, know nothing, sick and twisted kid, NEVER reproduces.
The sooner she gets institutionalised, the better for ALL OF US!
Now as for Sir David, what's is face, I care no more for what he says or ever has said than I do for anyone who dares to profit at the expense of others.
He is just another sad puppet like that useless Swedish maggot, and the sooner he gets put away as well, the better.
Now for some current and real information, actually worth hearing/seeing, I submit the following, hot off the internet;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMF9aMI-9ek

The alarmists worst nightmares are now coming in thick and fast.
If they can't see that this whole thing is a con, then it means they don't want to see it.
That's OK, there refuting the truth, won't change the truth.
It's a shame that, once more we won't be able to rub their faces in it, as it becomes more and obvious, that CC is a con.

simple fact that as soon as you deny your Creator and accept a hopelessly flawed fantasy such as evolution then perverting science becomes easy. The dumb something from nothing faith theory opened the door to the dumber 'we can change the climate theory/scam'. Sir David might win applause by true deniers and make heaps of money pushing his lies but could not possibly impress anyone interested in truth and true science.

Hans Hass was ahead of ol' Sir Dave by a good 30 years and, he recognised the "real" danger !
Over-population !

Individual,

No, not at all:

http://ourworldindata.org/search?q=population

The world is about to reach 'peak child'. Perhaps within our lifetimes (yours and mine), most of the world will reach zero population growth BUT population will still grow for a bit longer, due to people living longer - i.e. reductions in mortality.

On current trends, which are fairly well predicted, world population will reach a maximum by about 2090-2100, and decline very slowly thereafter. The world will get older, but healthier.

If Africa is able to develop economically more quickly, all this will happen sooner.

Joe

Loudmouth2,
I'm somewhat buoyed by that, perhaps the good old Dr. Prof. Hass's letter did make the rounds after all !

Individual,

On average, women these days get about twice as many years' education as forty-odd years ago - that's what cuts down the fertility rate. Medical improvements have cut infant mortality around the world and that also - strange as it may sound - cuts down on the fertility rate.

And so on: the articles on that web-site cover pretty much any population issue you may have interest in.

Joe