Steelies and Paul's ideology has just led to mass destruction, Now they just batten down and continue their hate fest. No wonder the Greens/left are so despised. Haters will be haters.

Ref. KI,

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/calls-for-koala-cull-due-to-surging-kangaroo-island-koala-numbers/news-story/8d42f0f23419fa68e653fdf4e57ce44e

Had the Koalas been culled then thousands of them would not have burned to death, which is rather obvious but they would have suffered much less.

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jan/07/kangaroo-island-bushfires-grave-fears-for-unique-wildlife-after-estimated-25000-koalas-killed

Joe / Loudmouth,

you're so right aren't you? So informed? You'll just dictate policy from your high-point of 'common sense' and armchair logic?

Every 5 years will fix it! My word! (Slaps armchair.)

Seriously, you armchair experts make me sick! Your echo-chamber here is causing one of the largest, mass-scaled cases of Dunning-Kruger's dumbassed-ness I've ever seen!

Listen you little pissant, Adjunct Associate Professor Phil Zylstra from Curtin University says Hazard Reduction might only be marginally effective for 3 years. THREE YEARS!
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/hazard-reduction-burns-not-a-silver-bullet/11846684

So while you ignorant, science denying little pissants pontificate on your flights-of-fantasy, out in the REAL world where REAL science is done and empirical measurements of the Aussie bush before and after fire management is scientifically measured, your conclusions are shown to be WORTHLESS. As in, worse than worthless, over-regular Hazard Reduction can CHANGE the bush and make FUTURE FIRES WORSE! (1939 Royal Commission.)

Seriously, when I debated MHAZE I was challenged to read IPCC reports and examine stuff. While debating MHAZE was frustrating, at least I learned something in that debate.

But you Deniers, you usual suspects? I feel like I'm wiping drool from your slack faces as you loll about in your stroke chairs.

Are you actually contributing KNOWLEDGE, or just congratulating yourselves on echoing the Denial-o-sphere in here?

You need to take a long hard look at yourselves.

Max,

Why has your superior intelligence not allowed you to grasp that to effectively shew user-friendly URLs on OLO you need to remove the 's' from 'https'?

https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/hazard-reduction-burns-not-a-silver-bullet/11846684

http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/hazard-reduction-burns-not-a-silver-bullet/11846684

See?

Hi,

I would like to join in the discussion and bring in some facts to quantify the debate. According to fifth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, 100 percent reason of all global warming worldwide over the past 60 years are human beings. It also states that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.

lizawilson11

'I would like to join in the discussion and bring in some facts to quantify the debate. According to fifth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, 100 percent reason of all global warming worldwide over the past 60 years are human beings. It also states that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.'

assuming the corrupt IPCC is half right, I suggest you go and protest the Indian and Chinese Embassies Liz as they are champions at emitting greenhouse gases. Logic, facts and rationale seem to escape when it comes to the warmist religion.