The Forum > General Discussion > Freedom of speech and association is not discimination
Freedom of speech and association is not discimination
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 23
- 24
- 25
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I will accept writing something similar, but definitely not what you wrote.
I wish I could remember so I could confirm it.
I'm sure someone will search back and find it.
Paul, it is intended as a sweeping statement, so as to explain that we are all on a level playing field.
This bill and it's purpose will not work as it is impossible to police and prosecute such a broad interpretation of what constitutes discrimination whether in speech or not.
The only way for any legislation to work is, if everyone stopped communicating with each other.
The written word is the worst culprit for getting someone in trouble under the freedom of speech laws.
Because there is no means of applying inflections in the written word, many times the same phrase can be interpreted several ways, from bad to good.
That's why I don't like texting, or even emails.
Whenever i receive one, if I can, I phone them back.
Much quicker and much more efficient, and the discussion was understood without any confusion or misunderstanding.
This whole thing of discrimination and controlling speech is a very bad idea and will serve no real or good purpose, only bad would come of it.
Look all we are talking about is the sensitivities of a very small number of people.
And as I have always said, we cannot have a situation where the minority dictates to the majority.
It would benefit everyone if we left well enough alone and those who are so piss weak as to be offended by anything offensive, whether it is or not, just grow up and grow a few more parts of the anatomy and we will all live happily ever after.