The Forum > General Discussion > Climate Not As Hot As You Predicted? Then Hot Up The Language!
Climate Not As Hot As You Predicted? Then Hot Up The Language!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
-
- All
Thunderbox has admitted in Spain that her childish performances have achieved nothing because emissions are still rising. The cheek of it!
Posted by ttbn, Monday, 9 December 2019 8:21:42 AM
| |
Aidan,
The longer the rant, the less interest I take. I don't read anything you address to me. You are boring. Posted by ttbn, Monday, 9 December 2019 8:25:07 AM
| |
Aiden, when was the Dalton minimum ?
I have recently seen information about various peaks in temperature much more frequently than I had previously understood. These additional ones have a period of 172 years. Cycles on cycles, they must all add up at some time. Posted by Bazz, Monday, 9 December 2019 11:11:21 AM
| |
Aiden, not to worry, I just looked it up. Interesting as it confirms
the very cold period in the UK when the Thames froze each winter. The low sunspot count enables cosmic rays to enter and form more clouds and so shade the earth and reflect more radiation back out. Interesting, Svenmark still looks viable. Posted by Bazz, Monday, 9 December 2019 11:18:28 AM
| |
Bazz,
>when was the Dalton minimum ? Early 19th century, mostly. It started at the end of the 18th century and lasted about thirty years. I don't know where you got that 172 year cycle claim from, but I doubt it's of much value. I suggest you read http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jan/09/the-imminent-mini-ice-age-myth-is-back-and-its-still-wrong Even the 11 year sunspot cycle, which is far more obvious and intense than longer term cycles, has a declining influence, as its effects are getting swamped by that of CO2. Posted by Aidan, Monday, 9 December 2019 11:38:47 AM
| |
Dear Aidan,
It's easy to see you know your stuff. I read as much science as I can to support my primary interest in environmental sociology. It's fascinating when one starts to see the Big Picture. Just be wary because Bazz, mhaze, ttbn, Hasbeen, etc (the usual suspects) are all climate witches. They're the reason we have an environmental crisis on our hands. Actually they are a great source of information on the behaviour of AGW denialists and I have had a load of fun studying them (albeit online) as part of my research in environmental sociology. I'm actually the one who came up with the term 'climate witch'. Posted by Mr Opinion, Monday, 9 December 2019 7:00:27 PM
|