Paul,

As expected you have bugger all, and admit that you are once again spouting vacuous BS.

Again, you misquote me as 2 years of commercial law within a BCom degree does not give me any legal letters behind my name nor have I ever claimed that it does.

As for using government funds for smearing the opposition, firstly this is a frequent tactic employed by Labor and the Greens who spent $ms of taxpayer money on phoney senate inquiries that had no purpose other than to try and show up the government.

Shadow, once again you have misrepresented the truth claiming the Taylor matter, quoting you; "a moron would know is not criminal". Yet to quote the police spokesperson; "the state crime command’s financial crimes squad had launched Strike Force Garrad to determine if any CRIMINAL OFFENCES had been committed."

Fess up Shadow, even a moron, or a half baked lawyer without "letters", would take the word of the police as to this being a criminal matter or not. Was the police spokesperson wrong, lying, what then?

Paul,

I do accept the police officer's word that an investigation has been instigated at the request of Labor asking whether a criminal act was committed as the police are obliged to do.

What I don't see is any indication from the police that they consider this in any way to be a criminal offense.

Dreyfus has previously initiated 8 such investigations into potential criminal activity by the coalition with zero criminal activity being detected. This looks like being No 9.

That should be simple enough even for any moronic half baked illiterate.

Nah Shadow riggle all you like, your big cheese ScumO might take it upon himself to stick his nose into police and/or judicial matters based on the 'Sulo' bin legal principle, mates look after mates, but it don't wash here. It is the police who determine if a matter is worthy of criminal investigation, not the complainant. This should be easy for even someone of your intellect, Daffy Duck could understand that, hopefully you can to.

"Labor asking whether a criminal act was committed as the police are obliged to do." No, you are making things up, the police are not obliged to "investigate" every complaint made to them by the general public or the Labor party for that matter. Frivolous and vexatious complaints are not investigated. Nor do the number or nature of previous complaints have any bearing on a new complaint, there is no 8 strikes and no more complaints will be accepted from you rule.

Okay, I accept you have no legal knowledge what so ever. This is a YouTube of SM defending Angus Taylor in court.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJuXIq7OazQ

Once again your incoherent post is a pile of bollocks. (what is riggle?)

The police are not obliged to investigate every complaint by the general public, but requests from the shadow (and former) Attorney General Mark Dufus are almost never ignored. That the last 8 "investigations" requested by Dufus produced no indication of a crime shows that this is a publicity stunt that even someone of your limited IQ should be able to grasp.

I agree that there is no limit on how many publicity stunts Labor can compel the police to perform.