The Climate emergency made over 100 youths start fires in QLD. They are hot headed bed wetters.

ttp://7news.com.au/news/qld/no-need-for-tougher-laws-for-queensland-kids-who-start-bushfires-says-government-c-564143?utm_campaign=share-icons&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&tid=1574205708407&fbclid=IwAR2Yo9avgkVO0IfR0VopuQMYxcgfNGJbZSQiPvIetQ-kgdpOv0AtZIPaAgk

Hey Max Green,

"Do you have something relevant to say about climate change?"

I do.

I don't know if there's any merit to this climate change business;

- But I think we should consider 'getting rid of' all the people whinging about climate change first.
All I ever hear about these days is this climate change this and climate change that.
On and on and on I wish everyone would just shut up.
I'm sick of it.

Armchair doesn't like science and is a bit sick of it.
Poor diddums.
When your grandchildren's crops fail and they starve to death, or get killed in some future climate war, get back to us about how sick you were about scientists warning us all this was coming, OK?

Max Green,

Yes, I have something relevant to say about climate change, I think that it is real but not necessarily man made and we should be minimising the danger of bushfires.

A place to start would be getting rid of a few million gum trees that are in a position to be a danger to human life.

We've just seen what happened in Wytaliba where love of trees outweighed common sense and years of warnings and sound advice.

If bushfires are going to get worse then we need to remove the major source of fuel.

First of all, the best science available to the human race disagrees with you and calculates that the KNOWN demonstrable radiative forcing of CO2 is trapping heaps of heat. Where that goes and the models that predict future impacts on local weather systems and micro-climates is another question, and they are perfecting those models all the time. But the overall picture is clear. It is us. It is our particular isotope of fossil CO2. Not the sun. Not Milankovitch wobbles. Not cosmic rays or volcanoes. Us. This is known. Debating this is just wrong.

Second of all, cut down millions of trees? People love trees. People NEED trees for psychological well being. Patients that can see trees from hospital windows recover faster. Did you know this? It's a fact. Cutting down millions of trees is exactly the OPPOSITE direction we want to take if we're going to help solve climate change. We don't just need clean energy systems like breeder reactors that eat nuclear waste, we need to reduce the current CO2 load on the atmosphere.

Maybe we can create fire breaks around our towns and cities, with careful attention to public parks getting enough recycled water for irrigating and reducing fire risk. But our national parks need more trees, not less, because the climate needs more trees. BILLIONS of them worldwide!

Dear Max Green,

It's obvious that you have a million dollar brain. Unfortunately you will find yourself arguing with a lot of $1 brains like mhaze, ttbn, Hasbeen, individual, Loudmouth and a lot of others who are skilled in pub philosophy. Good luck.