The Forum > General Discussion > Why Multiculturalism not integration
Why Multiculturalism not integration
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- ...
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It's obvious that you see only merit in immigration (probably influenced by your own experience) but in doing so you fail to see that there is a dark side to immigration in Australia over the last several decades.
Two factors need to be taken into account (1) Australia has a very fragile environment which can only support a sustainable population of 8-9 millions in the absence of technology and science, and (2) the high rates of immigration over the past three decades have been part of a governmental program aimed to increase development as a consequence of increasing population pressure, a form of social engineering that really only benefits politicians, developers and the business community. None of it has actually been for the benefit of the nation.
So the sum of the matter is that politicians, developers and the business community have been destroying our environment for their own profit. Jared Diamond has criticised the Chinese as a particular threat to the Australian environment, saying that they are wealthy migrants who bring in lots of cash looking for a First World lifestyle; this makes the developers and business community happy but it imposes an increasing burden on a fragile environment. Or, as I would say, a prime example of how increasing global consumerism is causing total environmental destruction.
So, there might be an upside to immigration but there is also a downside. We need to achieve a balance but unfortunately the scales have tilted heavily towards the downside.