go to any prison and the blackfellas will tell you that their woman put them in. Sometimes they just want a break from their man. Unfortunately many do beat their wives but it is by no means one way. A friend of mine was witnessing a man beating his wife. When the Police arrived they both turned on the Police. Do women lie? Well even on olo many have been caught out.

The family court has been controlled by the radical ratbag left, since it's inception, with a large chunk of control now transferred to the oh so biased womens libbers.

It is about time it was hauled back to some sort of sanity, with a bit of equity added to it's focus.

Dear runner,

In family law, the lack of experience in the
most sensitive cases, dealing with fragile
humans will be exacerbated with inexperts in
charge. It will be a sham inquiry. A vehicle
for Pauline Hanson to broadcast the range of her
ignorance, fed not on facts but anecdotes
from her supporters. Her poor grasp of the
evidence about what happens in the family court
is a red flag.

Also the appointment of Kevin Andrews is concerning.
With his evangelical mission to save marriages.
Some marriages cannot be saved and trying to do so
puts parties and children at risk.

Dear Hasbeen,

The family court has had problems since its
inception in 1975. Here it is 2019 and it
continues to be beset by problems. This
latest - the planned inquiry to be run by Kevin
Andrews and Pauline Hanson is being advertised as
an attempt to "bring men along". But is it really
nothing more than pandering to extremists?

Surely the vast majority of Australian men don't
need to be patronised.

The Sydney Morning Herald tells us that government
after government has decreased funding, wanted to
change the Family Court's make-up, and provided
inadequate funding for counselling and mediation.

The Coalition government in particular, slashed
funding to community law centres.

Wouldn't it be better to just give the Family Court
the resources it needs and let it get on with its
work?

No more inquiries. We know what we need to do. Let the
judges and Family Court get on with it.

'Also the appointment of Kevin Andrews is concerning.
With his evangelical mission to save marriages.
Some marriages cannot be saved and trying to do so
puts parties and children at risk.'

yeah I know Foxy you leftist regressives would be happier with people who have trashed their own marriage or don't even believe in it to judicate. No bias though.

runner,

One of the biggest threats to the Family Court
is described by Jacqui Lambie who in her
brutally honest way tells us that:

"Most Australians would think that for a judge to
get the top job you'd have to go through a rigorous
review process. I was shocked to discover that,
instead of a peer review process to examine your
experience and expertise, now all the Attorney-General
Christian Porter has to do is ring up a mate and
offer them a judgeship. That's crazy and frightening
when you think that someone may only have experience
in corporate law and is being asked to make a decision
about where your kids live".

In family law, lack of experience in these most sensitive
cases and dealing with fragile humans, as stated earlier,
will be exacerbated with inexperts in charge. It can
do great harm and puts parties at risk.

Surely you should be able to see and understand that
enough to leave your bias and politics aside.