The Forum > General Discussion > Stopping welfare payments to those who refuse to take a drug test. Why?
Stopping welfare payments to those who refuse to take a drug test. Why?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Look I could be sitting here explaining how the cost per person to run the Cashless Card trial is approximately $10,000 and is done by a private company with Liberal Party links.
I can probably say with confidence that this will be a bloody windfall for whoever gets the extended contract and will line pockets every which way but Sunday.
But these were not issues I have canvassed because I wanted to explore the very simple contention that if the reason for bringing in those who tested positive to go on to a Cash Card to limit their discretionary spending why aren't we putting people who refuse a drug test on the same Card with the same arrangement rather than stripping them of their benefits?
I am not here to challenge anyone's belief that this will reduce drug dependency although I don't share that belief at all.
All I want is for someone to stick their hand up and tell me why stripping benefits from someone for refusing a drug test makes any kind of sense in this situation?