Mr Opinionated, Brain washed by University lectures makes you educated in their opinion. Get out on the ground and do a balanced research.
There are many scientists that do not hold your LEARNED opinion.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/trevornace/2019/02/05/earths-magnetic-north-pole-has-officially-moved/?fbclid=IwAR3N2FCBcEkRVJdMuMX6pYg9clSi370fhANn3RB3m327D7d5LySsjjVGexM#37b14f9e6

Dear Josephus,

Obviously you haven't read the article recommended by Bazz:

Cook, J., et al. 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature', Environmental Research Letters 8 (2), 2013.

Bazz reckons it's the bee's knees.

Is that your platform: to get people out of universities? I suppose you want to shut down all of the universities as well so that everybody can enjoy being as ignorant as you and your denialist mates.

"Has everyone seen the article Bazz told me about"

Yep, read it 5 or 6 years ago. It was rubbish then and its rubbish now.

"Both the father of global warming Hansen and the IPCC reports have been consistently on the money about the temperature increases."

Here's how it works. They make a series of calculations with predictions for high, low and moderate temperature increases. They then promote the high scenario as though its the most likely outcome. Then a decade or so later when its clear that the low scenario was closest to the truth they start asserting how accurate they were and pretending that they never believed or promoted the high scenario.
By way of balance....http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/

In another really interesting development, new research calls into question the whole temperature data record. There have always been some concerns about the quality of the data and the fact that most of the reported temperature rise is the result of adjustments rather than measurements. NOAA tried to resolve this in the USA by creating their Climate Reference Network (USCRN). After 14 years of operation this shows no warming, indeed a slight cooling, in continental USA. Wouldn't it be hilarious if this whole colossal scare was based on false data. Full story here: http://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2019/08/23/climate_alarmists_foiled_no_us_warming_since_2005.html

Dear mhaze,

I don't think you are in a position to argue against anthropogenic global warming and its consequential climate change.

Mr O wrote: "I don't think..."

For once I agree with him.

Josephus, Mr O just makes up these 'credentials' he claims. He is unable to actually argue the point so tries to rely on claimed superior understanding to avoid having to argue the point. Its all very sad.

tbbn,

Re:Joelle Gergis.

She's a lightweight. Back in 2012 she issued a paper called Gergis et al 2012. It claimed to show that Australia was the warmest it had been for 1000 years. It claimed to prove that the net highest temperatures were in the 13th century when it was 0.09c cooler than now!!. They actually believe this rubbish.

Anyway, the boys at Climate Audit looked at the paper and within a day or so showed that the data, mathematics and methodology were all wrong. Eventually, some of her embarrassed co-authors forced Gergis to withdraw the paper. The whole project had been funded by the Australian taxpayer and cost over $300,000. If she's crying it should be from embarrassment and shame at wasting that money.

But she's still fated as having a clue. That's how climate 'science' works these days.