ttbn,

right again, but don't bother, she's baiting us and I had to take the bait just this once to suggest to you not to get sucked in.
She's looking to once again brag about how many posts she got because her topic was SO interesting. (she thinks)
So the best response is to not respond, that will demonstrate exactly how her topics rate.
Unless her buddies come to her rescue and comment just to spite anyone who dares to put her in her place.
Anyway see you later, in a real and interesting topic.

ALTRAV,

Thank You for promising to stay away from this topic
or for that matter, any topic or discussion that I shall
offer in the future.

I trust that you are a man of your word and will keep
it.

ALTRAV,

Yes mate. She always 'baits', and that's the only reason I made a comment. She and her mate Belly do like to provoke people by questioning them. I suppose it's a break from tormenting small children and pulling the wings off flies.

ttbn,

Now you are seriously trying to provoke.

Go follow your friend and have some
in-depth discussions,

Ah, wait ...

Dear Foxy,

Your opening comments are in some ways correct but generally are a departure from sociological, anthropological and historical perspectives. I get the impression that you have read something of Durkheim. I like to use a Marxist approach to define religion because its philosophies and practices are embodied within historical perspectives and can be defined by politico-economic infrastructures. Religions are not all the same and religious periods are separated by the particular polities that such periods represent. A fascinating topic with an endless array of theories to define it!

Foxy the answer is YES
Every faith tells us it is the only one true faith
Many faiths say it is ok to kill others from different faiths
If we had no God we may well learn to live together\Hurts many but
an honestly held view