Belly,
Why do see the need to always twist words ? No-one is "targeting"migrants", Because of your leftie mates, people weren't allowed to single out any particular groups & now they're clamping down on free speech by including all migrants.
What most Australians object to are those migrants who do nothing for this country & only cause division. They are certain migrants not just migrants.
Looking around Sydney do you still think Pauline was wrong in her maiden speech & was condemned by so many for it ?
There are as many good migrants & they outnumber the not so good ones but, they don't appear to openly condemn their fellow compatriots when they do wrong.
Look at the Chinese in Australia. They don't have enclaves & they openly mix with others. They're successful migrants who built a better live here. Can you say that of those whose religion dictates to them to bring us under their yoke ? No, so why should we not treat them the way they treat us ?

Foxy, regurgitation of Labor's position is not providing a costing. What companies do or don't do is irrelevant.

What money is Labor plowing into infrastructure, subsidies, cheap loans and other incentives to renewables to get to its 45% target? To simply suggest that homes and businesses will take up the climate fight without these incentives is completely fatuous.

Some idea of what has been spent to achieve the current level of renewables penetration should give a guide to the massive amount we're talking, or we could cast our minds to Germany, where around 30% renewables has cost hundreds of billions of euros.

How Shorten is getting away with his pea and thimble trickery on this matter is astonishing.

indy, lefty mates, in truth after you use that term nothing you say is worth reading
We lost candidates today, again, and we should have lost the Labor one for the seat of Melbourne
BUT see we once owned that seat, the greens do now
We want to win it back, but can not replace the fool if we dump him
Sad but true he will remain for the above reasons
BOTH parties need to fix shrinking branch numbers
And pre selection processes

Heard recently on television - when a Liberal
politician was asked about carbon pollution?
-
he explained that "Yes we believe in reducing
it in Australia - definitely but selling - coal to Asia,
is good for our economy."

There you have it folks.

All in a nutshell - they can pollute all they want
in the Northern Hemisphere. Our economy is what
matters. And what happens in other parts of the
planet - won't affect us - right? Air does not move
South

Maybe Labors well thought out policies will save the country?
http://www.news.com.au/national/federal-election/scott-morrison-details-his-favourite-breakfast-targets-labor-over-plans-to-change-vegemite-recipe/news-story/3002672ae1056107fcafbe9b894bdb7b

What I want to know is where they got these idea from?
Did a member of the ALP come up with this idea and if so why?
Who are they towing the line for?

Which agenda is it?

The one where you score points by attacking anything that relates to 'national culture'?
Or the one where they tell us what we can and can't eat?

I told you all months back there's an agenda against red meat.
I keep seeing the red flags of things to come:

"You vilt eat vot vie tell you to eat!"

"Don't you know about zee climate change nincompoop?"

"Zee planet will be kaput"

I mean really Belly, what chance do anyone of us have if this is the best our pollies can come up with for policy.

"Let's change the recipe for vegemite"
(Because the yanks don't like our ingredients)

Seriously, you have to stand back and go 'What's the bigger picture here?' just to start to appreciate how completely messed up our country is...

Vegemite.

And Shorten?
What an incompetent sellout.

Hi Belly, I see the Coalition just booted another candidate for Islamophobic comments. This time its the candidate for the Tasmanian seat of Lyons, Jessica Whelan, goodbye Jessie. Me thinks the Coalition is full of far right extreme candidates. The duffer who leads the Nationals got it right, his party has plenty in common with Pauline Hanson's One Nation, and they should be preferenced by the party.