probably not a bad suggestion Foxy. Who do you suggest?

Peter Dutton.

'Peter Dutton.' I think Tony would edge him. He did stop the boats and get rid of the breathing tax! Defied everyone who said these things were impossible.

It's incredible the two issues at the heart of this Ridd case are being virtually ignored on this thread.

http://jennifermarohasy.com/2019/03/two-truths-at-the-heart-of-peter-ridds-sacking/

Interesting article JF Aus.

Yes, CM. Very interesting.

From my perspective the whole situation is very concerning.
JCU and also Peter Ridd are focussed on sediment when in reality the problem is nutrient pollution killing coral and seagrass food web nurseries.

Farmer's are being blamed for da manage to the GBR, resulting in more and more restrictive legislation that is affecting farming business and family livelihood, when it is the unmanaged dissolved nutrient load in municipal sewage waste water dumped daily that is the cause.

Non political science should have easy and urgent access to the resources being lost on misleading nonsense suggesting the whole GBR is doomed due to silt and CO2 emissions.

All point source nutrient pollution linked to eutrophication is the problem.

It's time for academic debate about JCU v/S Ridd to turn to debate about nutrient pollution from all point sources devastating world ocean ecosystems, not just the GBR.
Seagrass areal coverage list to nutrient proliferated algae is resulting in lack of food for ocean animals including now devastated tuna populations.
Hungry animals are cleaning out island fish on which island people depend for essential protein. Under nutrition is causing increase in maternal mortality and NCD including Diabetes, liver, kidney and heart disease.

Dire urgency to identify all causes of coral and seagrass damage must be debated and understood so proper solutions can be put in place.
The problem is not CO2.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946114/