Belly,
How do you come to that idiotic conclusion ?

If there were much less people in Australia and everyone had their own land then there would be no need for a minimum wage or unemployment benefits. If you don't work the land or produce something that someone wants you don't eat.

There are a number of policies throughout history often Locke Liberal in nature that have lead to the conflicts of modern society. The different parties end up pointing their fingers at the other side. If everyone owns their own land they are responsible for their own survival.

Australia would have the highest minimum wage in the world if the extreme socialist, Bill Shorten introduces his “living wage”. France and Luxembourg currently have that 'honour’.

The thing that the socialist have always feared is that people will be rewarded on efforts and results. Instead they always appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Like churches runner bludging off society without effort and giving no results. Producing paedophiles, along with a load of mumbo-jumbo.
I asked before runner, but you never answered, where does your church hide its paedophiles?

Minimum wage is also a way to make to poorly qualified unemployable for a first job. A way of causing marginal job's to get reduced hours or disappear entirely.

Whilst the idea of a living wage makes sense so to does the idea that the kind of jobs which are subject to the minimum wage probably should never be long term roles.

Maybe the issue could be tackled in some other way than no minimum wage but there are some good reasons for making it easier for employers to take a chance on those with no work experience or who for some other reason need the employment experience and history more than they need to be self supporting at that point in time.

R0bert