The Forum > General Discussion > Pell: Disgraceful Decision
Pell: Disgraceful Decision
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Page 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- ...
- 58
- 59
- 60
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
«I think it is incumbent on the judge to apply a custodial sentence, if for no other reason than satisfying community expectations for these sorts of crimes.»
Fine with me because I anyway am not invested in being counted as part of the "community".
Who exactly would this "community" consist of? How does one become admitted to it? Is it a requisite to be loud and cruel?
The only dishonest claim would be to simultaneously consider me as part of this "community" AND say that this community wants (and is even willing to pay dearly for) to incarcerate old and no-longer harmful people as punishment for things they might have done decades ago.
For the record, I harbour no expectations of the kind whatsoever. Prison is an horrendous place and wanting people to be locked up in there is pure sadism. Nobody should ever be thrown in jail unless they pose an imminent danger to others and absolutely no other solution is available.