The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > One World Government, positive or negative?

One World Government, positive or negative?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. All
I don't know about the rest of the world but the only thing that could save Australia is an invasion of common sense. The present bureaucracies are ruining this Nation & we don't even know for what. Greed sticks out by a mile as does disinterest for the common good !
Posted by individual, Friday, 8 February 2019 6:53:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Belly,

One World Government?

I don't see it happening.

The UN was never designed to be a world government.
It has no legal authority over its member states.
It won't happen until the powerful nations give
up their right to veto decisions and they're
not about to do that. They need to protect their
own interests.

Participation in the UN is not mandatory which makes
it harder for the UN to do things.
Posted by Foxy, Friday, 8 February 2019 9:55:25 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy in the end any thing is possible
Just maybe the failure to fix so very much will one day see promises made that will get people on side
Too we know a war can come, and if lost by the west
China, maybe in partnership with Russia could win such a war
Posted by Belly, Friday, 8 February 2019 10:41:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I personally would be prepared to die to prevent it.

Just imagine the result when a Hitler, Starlin or Chairman Mo came to power, & one would, probably sooner rather than later. Today such people only get to control one country, & that is bad enough.

Give people like the EU bureaucrats power over the entire population, & catastrophe would follow in even greater that the EU catastrophe currently tearing itself apart.
Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 8 February 2019 10:53:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Indi: A World Govt would turn out to be like the EU.

I think that what the EU & the UN are working towards. I see that so many other Countries in Europe are watching the UK just now. If that's a success then they'll pull out. Denmark will be the first to pull out after the UK. France & Italy will follow.

Foxy: One World Government? I don't see it happening.

It can't be allowed to happen. Many people have been working for it's inception for a long time. It would be worse for people than Socialism or Communism. These people have imbedded themselves in the Government of Most Countries, in the EU & the UN. I did read a book once, many years ago. It was a Paperback & had a grey Cover. I can't think of the name of it. However, it outlined the relationships of Big Multi-National Companies, Unions, Organizations & Individuals to each other & the a One World Government Movement. It also outlined how they all work with each other to keep the entire World in turmoil. The Aim was to Create this One World Government.

Maybe someone remembers the name of the Book. I think it came out in the late 80's early 90's.

There would be an elite & everybody else would virtually be Slaves.

They even made the UK change the name of Towns, I came across one in Scotland which had a town sign (xxxx, formally known as, yyyy) We asked them at the Pub & were told that the EU had considered the name of the town was unacceptable. On that note. Johnny Walker Scotch's name was changed to John Barr Scotch for the same reason. I brought a bottle. ;-)
Posted by Jayb, Friday, 8 February 2019 12:16:05 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Think about the mechanics of this.

Say it was to be bought about peacefully. How would its parliament work? Each nation gets a vote? Would China agree to being equal with Tonga? Would each nation get a vote equal to its population? Would Tonga agree to being swamped by China? (BTW that would encourage each nation to have a 10 child policy)

The logistics of how it'd work are mind-boggling and usually skated over by those pushing the notion because it's insurmountable.

The other option is some one nation steals a lead militarily and decides to conquer the world. Now its been tried once or twice before (Sargon, Xerxes, Alexander, Caesar (Julius not Octavian who was much too practical for such foolishness), Mo and his mates, Genghis, Napoleon, the Kaiser, Hitler etc) but all failed. there's little likelihood of a change in that pattern.

But no matter how it were to happen, it'd be bad for humankind.
Posted by mhaze, Friday, 8 February 2019 12:19:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy