//Now that is a statement that raises a few questions; could we have a reference, please?//

I believe he is talking about the recent single origin hypothesis (RSOH):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans

Although why he thinks that only Australian aboriginals, out of all the world's ethnic groups, should be identified on the basis of the countries (not that they were countries at the time, obviously) they migrated through rather than where they ended up settling is something of a mystery to me. And why he has singled out Indonesia rather any of the many other countries people migrating out of Africa would have had to pass through is also a mystery.

It seems to me that whilst he may be dimly aware of the RSOH, he hasn't really understood it.

//Toni, please be careful what you post THE EMPIRE might strike back.//

What's he gonna do, Paul? Cry on me?

ALTRAV, Ttbn- Yes- It's part of the communist strategy of "permanent revolution". But we can learn from their strategy- doesn't mean we have to use it. The communists have gone to war against western civilization in the form of diversity policy- mostly this means change- we now need to take the initiative and avoid the ambushes.

"Communists and Liberals are using change and community destruction to alienate the masses so they can control the world".

We want to protect the masses from the communist attacks as much as we can- we need to bring the alienated into our fold. We need to fight the root cause of the issues. Sometimes we need to strategically retreat from pointless skirmishes- to conserve our strength.

It's a difficult but noble life long cause. Good luck. Truth is on our side- but it's a "spy war".

If people don't fight for their interest they and their descendants will become effectively destroyed.

The world has too many people.

Dear Philip S,

So this character claimed “They got triggered and upset that I was standing on Australian Day holding my flag.”

Sorry mate but the bloke was a trolling and giving lip looking to get a reaction. Mission accomplished but no innocence there at all.

Dear ALTRAV,

We have been here before haven't we. Last time I turned this around and referred to you as an upstart wog with utter contempt for Australians you got your nose totally out of joint.

Ah here it is;

“This is not normally my style however since you are so keen on three latter labels, and I always endevour to return a conversation in the same manner it was delivered, let us try on a fresh framing of your logic, just for arguments sake of course.

I am completely clueless how on earth a bloody wog like yourself thinks they can call themselves Australian. Unless you have some Aboriginal blood in you or you or your ancestors fought for this country or you are at least 5th generation then you will always remain just a visiting wog with an inflated opinion of himself. Oh you might want to call yourself an Australian just to access our free healthcare and education, and you might have a pretty little bit of paper saying you are a citizen, and you might even claim to have been born here, but you aren't Australian really are you, you are just a wog. In fact you have a pretty low opinion of this country and its people don't you. I am getting so bloody sick of arrogant wannabe wogs like yourself trying to claim they are true Australians. It is utter BS. You come over here and within a generation you are claiming free services, provided in a good measure by the minerals dug from Aboriginal lands, like it is your right.”

So why on earth should we take any notice of the opinion of some upstart virtually fresh off the boat regarding our national holiday?

Paul, the word 'abo', might be disparaging to you and some others.
To me it's called expediency, as you will note, if you have been paying attention, that I abbreviate as a matter of course.
'Abo', 'wog', 'chink', 'kiwi', 'pom' and so on.
Sound familiar, I use common and historical terms such as those I grew up with.
Let me set the record straight and have it on the record once and for all, for all to note.
I do not use these titles to mock or denigrate.
I am a lazy person so to expedite, I try to abbreviate, such 'govt', 'pollies' and so on.
I hope this allays any concerns or disparaging thoughts generated by my style of writing.
If I want to abuse or denigrate someone, you've all witnessed what I mean, I don't resort to 'name calling' as a rule, I will just come out and abuse you, end of.
Toni,
Your right, my rightful land is Italy.
'Why don't I move back there'?
Well, DUH, let me see, oh yes, because I was 'born here'.
As for being 'dimly aware' of the RSOH, I am, if you take a 'mummy' look again at the information, you will find that they speak in ten's of thousands of years, long enough for a breed/race/type/kind of people to earn the the nationality of that country, even though it wasn't a country back then.
So if you don't want to call them Indonesians then call them what you like, but they still came from somewhere else and settled here.
Issy,
My reference is history itself, but for expediency just click on Toni's link.
It's a good starting point.

What was the date before 1988?

_______________________________________________________________

runner, are you referring to the moa? Or are you claiming there were prior human inhabitants that the rest of us have never heard of?