Secularism/marxism and Islam have far more in common than Christianity and Islam. They are both violent death cults one in the name of Allah and the other worshippers of self.

In 1978 the Christian Jim Jones and his followers murdered over 900 people, including about 300 children at Jamestown Guyana, all in the name of Christianity. Reprehensible behaviour is not excursively restricted to Muslims. Christians also have an atrocious history of justifying the murder of many in the name of their god.

You blokes are very selective when blaming religions for murder, the Muslims do it in the name of their god, but your mob don't, because they are misguided, according to you. In both cases the vast majority of adherents to the religion "responsible" do not agree or support this murderous behaviour carried out by a few in the name of their religion.

A pox on all religions!

Paul1405 Quote "By your logic if three men attack a woman in Melbourne and they happen to be Muslim, then it is a 'Muslim Attack' but should they be Christian then it simply three men attacking a women, nothing to do with religion. Because if they happen to be Muslim, you are straight on the bandwagon to point it out, and link it to all Muslims. Interesting."

** I did not even bring Muslims into it YOU did. **

** King of lies show me one comment of mine where I have linked the crimes of any Muslims to ALL Muslims.** Simply PUT UP OR SHUT UP.

Quote "Thanks for that Phil, "lL Duce", I would not want to get it wrong. Making such an error and I could find myself hanging upside down in the village square. "

** Sarcasm in the face of mistakes, very unbecoming. **

do we have standards here
I think we do, and insults such as the one used against Paul is needless
Foolish too

Phil, is not your Islamophobia one of your favourite topics for discussion on the forum, so I picked that as an example. Like any good propagandist you present material from a biased third party, like the UK rag 'The Daily mail'. Presenting that material for consumption, particularly by those that already hold a positive inclination towards the biased objective of the article. In that way it appears that the so inclined reader will believe they have drawn their own conclusions from the article, and have not been influenced by the writer.
One of the Joseph Goebbels standard rules for presenting good propaganda. I am not saying you intentionally do that, but that is how it comes across. Then when confronted you jump on your high horse and with indignation proclaim "I did not say that". Of course you didn't say that, you didn't need to.

Now you can jump on your high horse again and throw a few superlatives at me, and deny any of the above is true.

Toni, don't fall into the same trap as all the other 'losers' on OLO.
If you want to win a point, make sure you actually are reading things correctly.
If I had intended to say....'gay people having public sex', I would have used those exact words.
Now as I try to be a little more pedantic and detailed than most, I try not to misquote.
So, to put you back in your box; I said 'Go back in the closet, do your 'thing' or each other behind closed doors NOT in public'.
You must be very perverted or possibly a queer yourself.
In fact, I might ask, judging by your leans on these topics I have been meaning to ask are you in fact a queer female, aka, lesbian?
It would certainly answer a few burning questions that have surfaced over time.
Anyway, NO I have not witnessed any queers having public sex, so it is in no way related to my point, and you know it.
Your attempt at virtue shaming doesn't work with me, you see having sex in public doesn't bother me, as long as I am the one having the sex, and with a woman!
Only a mental deficient could condone any acts of queerdom, it engenders vial disgust at the thought of someone 'punching poo'.
And as for all the other unsavoury acts perpetrated by, not only queers, but traditional couples, well, it beggars belief.
And before one of the in house buffoons touches their keyboard in response, NO, I have not performed any lewd acts as is the norm today.
I have been more than happy to 'play' with the toys God gave us and not gotten bored with them so as to find more use out of the same toy.
When something is used in such a way other than what it was designed for, it just does not work, because it was not designed for any other function or use.